2016 Zero DSR - Coolness Factor = 61.9%

Your Coolness Factor of the 2016 Zero DSR is:

You may select 1 option

 
 
View results

Message
Author
User avatar
Grey Thumper
Legendary 1000
Legendary 1000
Posts: 1434
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 11:21 pm
Real Name: Dino
Sex: Male
Years Riding: 9
My Motorcycle: 2004 BMW R1150Rockster, 2015 BMW R1200GS
Location: Manila, Philippines

Re: This Week: 2016 Zero DSR - Vote Now

#11 Unread post by Grey Thumper »

Is there a motocross or dual sport version of this bike? Trail riding might be a more interesting application for an e-bike. Great torque at all revs, plus a quiet engine, would be appreciated on a trail. As long as the trail isn't much over, say, 100 miles start to finish.
"If you ride like there's no tomorrow, there won't be."

User avatar
ceemes
Legendary 2000
Legendary 2000
Posts: 2153
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 5:35 pm
Real Name: a big secret
Sex: Male
Years Riding: 26
My Motorcycle: 1998 Triumph Trophy
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada, Sol 3, the Milky Way Galaxy, the Known Universe.

Re: This Week: 2016 Zero DSR - Vote Now

#12 Unread post by ceemes »

snakedoctEr726 wrote:Ok. Even in the context of commuter bikes, it's still a flat out fail because it costs literally 4x as much as a purpose built commuter bike should. If it's a commuter bike, where are the heated grips? Where's the windscreen? Where are the luggage options?

Besides, who only uses their bike for commuting and nothing else?
How so? Heated grips? Got those on the Trophy, never used them, good pair of thermal gloves has done the trick for me ever since I started riding. Windshield, ok but not required. Luggage, again nice to have, but not really needed.

Only my last two bike had full fairings, windshields, and luggage, and only the Trophy has heated grips, never really needed any of those before. Even my old courier bikes did not have any of those options, made do with a bag and bungee cord to tie down bigger packages on to my saddle or rear carrier rack if I had one.

And yes the up front cost is high, however given the cost of a litre of gas here in BC, recharging this bike would only cost a fraction of filling my Trophy's tank or even that of a smaller bike. Once you average out the cost per kilometre or mile over the lifetime of the bike, I'd bet it would close to that of a gas powered machine.
Always ask why.

Image

User avatar
faded sun
Elite
Elite
Posts: 232
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 4:19 pm
Real Name: John, but my friends call me Jock
Sex: Male
Years Riding: 46
My Motorcycle: 2012 Victory Vision Tour/Honda Stateline
Location: Toronto

Re: This Week: 2016 Zero DSR - Vote Now

#13 Unread post by faded sun »

Grey Thumper wrote:Is there a motocross or dual sport version of this bike? Trail riding might be a more interesting application for an e-bike. Great torque at all revs, plus a quiet engine, would be appreciated on a trail. As long as the trail isn't much over, say, 100 miles start to finish.
This is the dual sport version, that's the DS in the DSR of the model name...

That's why the guy in the picture is wearing one of those weird-"O Ring" motocross helmets.

:)
Jock

Ride Safely. Respect nature. Always wear a helmet.

User avatar
Grey Thumper
Legendary 1000
Legendary 1000
Posts: 1434
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 11:21 pm
Real Name: Dino
Sex: Male
Years Riding: 9
My Motorcycle: 2004 BMW R1150Rockster, 2015 BMW R1200GS
Location: Manila, Philippines

Re: This Week: 2016 Zero DSR - Vote Now

#14 Unread post by Grey Thumper »

faded sun wrote:This is the dual sport version, that's the DS in the DSR of the model name...

That's why the guy in the picture is wearing one of those weird-"O Ring" motocross helmets.

:)
I stand corrected. :) Wheels seem kinda flimsy looking though. Unless the whole dual sport aspect of it is more of a styling thing and this bike wasn't meant to be taken off pavement?
"If you ride like there's no tomorrow, there won't be."

snakedoctEr726
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 54
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2012 7:18 am
Real Name: Kyle
Sex: Male
Years Riding: 6
My Motorcycle: '11 BMW K1300S
Location: Colorado

Re: This Week: 2016 Zero DSR - Vote Now

#15 Unread post by snakedoctEr726 »

ceemes wrote:
snakedoctEr726 wrote:
It's ok if you prefer nakeds without any creature comforts, but none of that is an argument supporting the DSR as a commuter. I'll change my vote from fail to uncool when Zero brings this machine to market for about $5-6k.

User avatar
dr_bar
Site Supporter - Diamond
Site Supporter - Diamond
Posts: 4532
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 4:37 am
Real Name: Doug
Sex: Male
Years Riding: 44
My Motorcycle: 2007 Yamaha Royal Star Venture
Location: Surrey BC, Canada

Re: This Week: 2016 Zero DSR - Vote Now

#16 Unread post by dr_bar »

ceemes wrote:
And yes the up front cost is high, however given the cost of a litre of gas here in BC, recharging this bike would only cost a fraction of filling my Trophy's tank or even that of a smaller bike. Once you average out the cost per kilometre or mile over the lifetime of the bike, I'd bet it would close to that of a gas powered machine.
Did you figure charging times into that calculation? My time is worth a small fortune at my age, waiting for the bike to charge, doesn't quite figure into my life...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"Four wheels move the body.
Two wheels move the soul!"

User avatar
NorthernPete
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3485
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 4:24 pm
Real Name: Pete
Sex: Male
Years Riding: 11
My Motorcycle: 1988 Kawasaki Vulcan 1500
Location: Northern Ontario, Canada

Re: This Week: 2016 Zero DSR - Vote Now

#17 Unread post by NorthernPete »

Idea is cool, and looks pretty neat. Tech wise and price point though, not really doing it for me. What's the point of it looking like it can carve if it's a commuter?

Still, I'll go cool just in hopes it'll get better.
1988 VN1500
2009 GS500F

User avatar
ceemes
Legendary 2000
Legendary 2000
Posts: 2153
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 5:35 pm
Real Name: a big secret
Sex: Male
Years Riding: 26
My Motorcycle: 1998 Triumph Trophy
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada, Sol 3, the Milky Way Galaxy, the Known Universe.

Re: This Week: 2016 Zero DSR - Vote Now

#18 Unread post by ceemes »

dr_bar wrote:
ceemes wrote:
And yes the up front cost is high, however given the cost of a litre of gas here in BC, recharging this bike would only cost a fraction of filling my Trophy's tank or even that of a smaller bike. Once you average out the cost per kilometre or mile over the lifetime of the bike, I'd bet it would close to that of a gas powered machine.
Did you figure charging times into that calculation? My time is worth a small fortune at my age, waiting for the bike to charge, doesn't quite figure into my life...
As a commuting bike yes, recharge times were taken into consideration, the key word is commuting, or commute. Depending on the distance you are commuting from home to work and back, you may just need to recharge when you get home, by the time you are ready to go back to work your bike should be ready to go, and many workplaces now have recharging points in their parking lots.
Always ask why.

Image

User avatar
ceemes
Legendary 2000
Legendary 2000
Posts: 2153
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 5:35 pm
Real Name: a big secret
Sex: Male
Years Riding: 26
My Motorcycle: 1998 Triumph Trophy
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada, Sol 3, the Milky Way Galaxy, the Known Universe.

Re: This Week: 2016 Zero DSR - Vote Now

#19 Unread post by ceemes »

NorthernPete wrote:Idea is cool, and looks pretty neat. Tech wise and price point though, not really doing it for me. What's the point of it looking like it can carve if it's a commuter?

Still, I'll go cool just in hopes it'll get better.
What the point of small economy cars looking like they can do 200 MPH and zero to 60 in under 3 seconds, when in reality they are lucky to top 100 MPH and get to 60 in under 10 seconds? Aesthetics pure and simple mixed with equal parts of vanity and ego. People like owning things that look flashy and pretty because they believe it makes them look flashy and pretty. It basic marketing 101, push the sexiness of an item to sell said item.
Always ask why.

Image

snakedoctEr726
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 54
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2012 7:18 am
Real Name: Kyle
Sex: Male
Years Riding: 6
My Motorcycle: '11 BMW K1300S
Location: Colorado

Re: This Week: 2016 Zero DSR - Vote Now

#20 Unread post by snakedoctEr726 »

I'm not done knocking this thing yet.

Picture this. You ride your DSR to work and back every day, then on the weekend your friends call and say "Hey buddy, want to come ride with us?" Then because you spent $18k on a bike with no range you are forced to reply "Well I want to, but I can only come on 1/4 of the ride you have planned, then I have to spend between 2 and 10 hours tied to an outlet to recharge." Does that sound like fun to you guys?

Let's talk performance. The DSR produces 106 ft-lbs of torque and it can do 0-60 in 4.5 seconds. My k1300s makes 103 ft-lbs, and it's capable of 0-60 in about 3 seconds. My K-bike also weighs 140lbs MORE than the DSR. The range figures published by Zero are almost certainly taken while hypermiling the bike and riding in the most boring and conservative way. If you were to ride one is a fast/fun way, I would expect to see the range decrease by anywhere from 10% to 50%.

The electric motorcycle is not a bad idea at all. Electric motors are interesting because they offer peak torque at any RPM, and they're way simpler than internal combustion engines. The battery powered motorcycle is a terrible idea for all the reasons I've listed in this thread. The technology just isn't there yet. I'm holding out for the hydrogen fuel cell and the supporting infrastructure. I'll freely admit that liquid hydrogen is difficult to get, but so is drilling holes hundreds of feet deep in the damn ocean and collecting oil. Humans are capable of solving bigger problems.

Post Reply