I do agree with you that a few members have really large signatures. The ONLY 2 options I have are:Kaiser Soze wrote:This isn't a real big deal, but there are a few members here with *huge* signatures. One I noticed this morning is 414 pixels high plus 4 lines of text. If this person makes a two line post in a thread, his post alone takes up pretty much my entire screen (at 1024x768).
This makes scanning through threads a bit of a pain. I go to other sites with limits on signature sizes; it makes reading the threads a lot easier.
Just throwing this out there to see what the others here think about it.
BusaEater wrote:^^Well if you had a problem with it you should've just asked me to change it and I would have gladly done it.
Isn't that what private messages are for?
Anyways, I'll change it.
lol, i saw "450 by 150" and thought "damnit, now I'll have to re-do the usergroup sigs. Just squeeked by . and those, even with the nifty fad effect and all those colors are only ~23kb, 100kb almost seems excesive. If someone is seriously having an issue getting their sig pic below that, pm me and i'll re-size it quality wise for them.totalmotorcycle wrote:450 pixels wide by 150 pixels tall and 100kb works for me.
100KB is BIG, but hey...I'll go with the flow...