+1Sevulturus wrote:And yes, carry as much gas as you can. Pushing a bike probably takes all the fun out of going for a tour.
Have fun. Post the pics when you get back.
A smaller, aerodynamic screen may help, but the big wide screens hurt, imo. They usually are near vertical when mounted, so the bike is pushing a "sail" into the wind. I tossed out an old Memphis Shades screen I had on the Magna and gained 3 mpg during highway cruising.CNF2002 wrote:I think a bikes aerodynamics have a big impact on your mileage. A windshield will help you gain some mpgs.
Agree. You don't want to get caught short. Unless you know the area so well you're 100% sure where the gas stations are and when they're open, I would fill the tank all the way up. It's amazing how some built-up areas where you think there should be gas stations actually have none.Nibblet99 wrote:stupid point i know... but if you're touring, you want as much fuel as you can get... Always assume every fuel station is closed, and its unlikely you will know where the nearest alternative is
A valid position. But, as the title of this thread asks, I found that losing the big flat shield helped to maximize fuel economy.-Holiday wrote:if i was that worried about saving 2 miles per gallon on the tour for money reasons, I probably couldnt afford to go.
that said, I should be able to report the differences on my cross country trip next month.
So walk< I Fly > wrote:Good points.
And as far as saving gas, it's not just about my money.
I don't want to give a cent more than necessary to the kleptocracy!
We have the technology. We have the ability. *Million-Dollar Man music*< I Fly > wrote:If my legs could propel me at 80 mph, I'd never buy another drop of gas.
TMW
Privacy Policy - Forum
Privacy Policy - Terms
and Conditions
Follow us on X / Twitter - Facebook - YouTube - Pinterest - Instagram - News RSS Feed |