Again, having bought many cars over the years, and helped others buy cars, and having done tons of research on this I still disagree. Conventional wisdom is negotiate price first, and put off all discussion of other topics, including financing and trade-in. Just tell the dealer you will discuss those items after you settle on a price, and tell the dealer you haven't decided whether to finance through them or not, and will decide on that issue only after having a firm price on the sale price of the vehicle. I've also told dealers I'm planning on financing with them, and then let them know I changed my mind after settling on a price. You aren't in this to help the dealer make money, you're in it to get the best deal possible. This means all costs, including finance costs should be considered. Saving $250 on the initial sale price, but paying an extra $1000 in interest is just a stupid way to handle money.Orange Crate wrote:It's been my experience that if you're "paying cash and only buying the car/bike" that you are not giving the dealer as many 'chances' to make money. ie: no extended warranty,no in-house fianance, no add on accesories.
Dealer "fold back" is a large part of their profit.
I propose you run a simple test- go price just a bike at a dealer- then have a buddy go in and price it with the dealer fia and ext warr.
Also, sales people generally are getting commission based on upfront costs, so they are less concerned about finance profits.
From an actual car salesman:
http://www.edmunds.com/advice/buying/ar ... ge003.html"That's a grand extra in profit. And it's front-end money too!" (I later learned that front-end money was what our commissions were based on. Back-end money was made on interest, holdbacks and other elements of the deal.)
Hey you go ahead and give away your money to the dealership by paying unnecessary financing fees/interest, extended warranties, accessories, etc. I'll continue to negotiate for the best price on the bike, and then decide how I want to handle the rest of the deal.