When people ask just say "Lets ride to Seattle, right now"Ryethil wrote:However, trying to explain my Honda ST sure is interesting. Rolling Eyes
When people ask just say "Lets ride to Seattle, right now"Ryethil wrote:However, trying to explain my Honda ST sure is interesting. Rolling Eyes
I've ridden a Street Glide to Califoria and found it to be fun. But the miles just melt under the ST. No, if they don't understand, I can't tell them.Johnj wrote:When people ask just say "Lets ride to Seattle, right now.Ryethil wrote:However, trying to explain my Honda ST sure is interesting. Rolling Eyes
It may not be that Harley cannot design something like the ST (I've never ridden one but based on your posts about the bike, it sounds like a smooth powerful machine), it's just that HD just won't. I don't know if you spend any time on the harley forums, but the VRSC line gets virtually no love from the traditional HD riders on that forum. Alot of older riders I know who are hardcore HD guys can't stand the Vrod and think that the MoCo made a huge mistake by designing and marketing the line. Why? You got me over a barrel...I have no idea.Ryethil wrote:I've ridden a Street Glide to Califoria and found it to be fun. But the miles just melt under the ST. No, if they don't understand, I can't tell them.Johnj wrote:When people ask just say "Lets ride to Seattle, right now.Ryethil wrote:However, trying to explain my Honda ST sure is interesting. Rolling Eyes![]()
Anyway, I love my Harleys but I don't think that HD could design something like the ST. Anyone have an opinion.?
Agreed. No reason for Harley to do it. The sport-tourer market in North America is small, tiny compared to cruisers, sport bikes, even dual-sports. Ducati got out of it, Aprilia got out of it (no more ST3's or Futura's). Honda, Yamaha, Kawi, BMW and Triumph fight over the crumbs. No need for another player in that market.koji52 wrote:It may not be that Harley cannot design something like the ST (I've never ridden one but based on your posts about the bike, it sounds like a smooth powerful machine), it's just that HD just won't.Ryethil wrote:I've ridden a Street Glide to Califoria and found it to be fun. But the miles just melt under the ST. No, if they don't understand, I can't tell them.Johnj wrote:When people ask just say "Lets ride to Seattle, right now.Ryethil wrote:However, trying to explain my Honda ST sure is interesting. Rolling Eyes![]()
Anyway, I love my Harleys but I don't think that HD could design something like the ST. Anyone have an opinion.?
As an aside, I really liked the Ducati STs and Aprilia Futura. They'll added a lot of style to the sport tourer market. They'll be missed, but that's what poor sales does.jstark47 wrote:Agreed. No reason for Harley to do it. The sport-tourer market in North America is small, tiny compared to cruisers, sport bikes, even dual-sports. Ducati got out of it, Aprilia got out of it (no more ST3's or Futura's). Honda, Yamaha, Kawi, BMW and Triumph fight over the crumbs. No need for another player in that market.
Harley is in a serious bind and it knows it. That is why they hired the new head honcho. Harley sales are dropping. How much of this is poor economic conditions or is Harley's core group is changing is unknown at this time. Secondly, aircooled motors are not condusive to meeting emission standards. As for the second, Harley will be forced to create more and more water pumpers to meet emmisions standards. Can it do this without turning off it's base group. That is why I use the VTX1300 as the model of what the future holds for us. Again, can Harley satisfy people who want a real Harley. So far, the base group down grades not only Sporsters but the V Rods too. And the V Rods are the face of the future.jstark47 wrote:Agreed. No reason for Harley to do it. The sport-tourer market in North America is small, tiny compared to cruisers, sport bikes, even dual-sports. Ducati got out of it, Aprilia got out of it (no more ST3's or Futura's). Honda, Yamaha, Kawi, BMW and Triumph fight over the crumbs. No need for another player in that market.koji52 wrote:It may not be that Harley cannot design something like the ST (I've never ridden one but based on your posts about the bike, it sounds like a smooth powerful machine), it's just that HD just won't.Ryethil wrote:I've ridden a Street Glide to Califoria and found it to be fun. But the miles just melt under the ST. No, if they don't understand, I can't tell them.Johnj wrote:When people ask just say "Lets ride to Seattle, right now.Ryethil wrote:However, trying to explain my Honda ST sure is interesting. Rolling Eyes![]()
Anyway, I love my Harleys but I don't think that HD could design something like the ST. Anyone have an opinion.?
EeeeRyethil wrote:Right now I think that things will get worse then better so I'm investing in new motorcycles. Even if things don't throw the company into confusion then there will be great changes to the way Harley is designing and marketing its products. So in the end I can enjoy them while I got them but they also will appreciate in value. We'll just have to wieght and see.jstark47 wrote:Agreed. No reason for Harley to do it. The sport-tourer market in North America is small, tiny compared to cruisers, sport bikes, even dual-sports. Ducati got out of it, Aprilia got out of it (no more ST3's or Futura's). Honda, Yamaha, Kawi, BMW and Triumph fight over the crumbs. No need for another player in that market.koji52 wrote:It may not be that Harley cannot design something like the ST (I've never ridden one but based on your posts about the bike, it sounds like a smooth powerful machine), it's just that HD just won't.Ryethil wrote:I've ridden a Street Glide to Califoria and found it to be fun. But the miles just melt under the ST. No, if they don't understand, I can't tell them.Johnj wrote:When people ask just say "Lets ride to Seattle, right now.Ryethil wrote:However, trying to explain my Honda ST sure is interesting. Rolling Eyes![]()
Anyway, I love my Harleys but I don't think that HD could design something like the ST. Anyone have an opinion.?
koji52 wrote:EeeeI feel like commenting on this is going to start an argument but I really really don't know if that's the best investment strategy. Unless youre buying a bike used at a price significantly below book and don't put too many miles on it or it's a classic bike, I think it's going to be hard to take advantage of any potential appreciation in value, especially if you think things are going to get worse before they get better and if the new products are going to be significantly better than what we can get now. The markets and economy won't be back to their height (in my opinion) for several years. I think people will continue to ask private for prices several thousands less than dealership prices and won't be buying above book value any time soon. You have to remember, vehicles are depreciating assets. If you're looking more for investment opportunities, I think the stock market is a much much much better choice (but that's just me). Just tryin to help a fellow rider out.
"or so" ??? How many motorcycles is "or so"??Ryethil wrote:.....Anyway, it's only about 4 or so....
TMW
Privacy Policy - Forum
Privacy Policy - Terms
and Conditions
Follow us on X / Twitter - Facebook - YouTube - Pinterest - Instagram - News RSS Feed |