its a GSXR1100 i dont know if its a 1996 or 1997 or 1998. its used and a 45 year old man had it. what do u guys think about this bike? i dont know what he wants for it. i just would like to know of your overall thought on performance and reliability. should i get a 1100 or a 600? why or why not?
2002 Buell Blast 500 /¦\
[url=http://www.putfile.com][img]http://x10.putfile.com/3/8221543225.gif[/img][/url]
[url=http://www.totalmotorcycle.com/BBS/viewtopic.php?t=11790]Confessions of a Commuter[/url]
ive ridden a 600 and a 250. they just dont have the "jump" i am looking for. i just want something bigger and badder. i just am not sure about the handling. or the reliability
vobra wrote:ive ridden a 600 and a 250. they just dont have the "jump" i am looking for. i just want something bigger and badder. i just am not sure about the handling. or the reliability
If a modern 600 doesn't provide enough "jump," your idea of a fast motorcycle belongs at the drag strip and the drag strip only.
[url=http://www.motoblag.com/blag/]Practicing the dark and forgotten art of using turn signals since '98.[/url]
Maybe you are just looking for the wrong type of bike. Sportbikes are made to rev, not "jump"
If you are looking for some torque, why not try something like the SV1000?
“People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use.”
- Soren Kierkegaard (19th century Danish philosopher)
thanks guys. i just want more low end power. i just want something different than your 600 series like the cbrs r6s and so on. i am truly wondering about the handling differences between your normal 600 and 1000 bikes. is it that much of a difference?