Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:31 am
i should have a nuke bomb!


25 Years. 425 Million Readers. 54 years of Motorcycle Guides ∙ Reviews ∙ The friendliest motorcycle community on the internet!
https://www.totalmotorcycle.com/BBS/
Judging by some of your posts, I'd rather have Iran get their hands on a nuke rather youThe Crimson Rider® wrote:i should have a nuke bomb!
That's the scary part. Judging by their actions, they would be inclined to actually use the weapons as much as use them as leverage.swatter555 wrote:If you look at their current rhetoric, it is obvious they want to stir up trouble.
"Answers on a postcard please..."sv-wolf wrote:Of course Iran wants nuclear power. When you have a very aggressive military state (Israel) on your doorstep, then of course you want it. When the most militarily powerful nation on earth grumbles darkly about making pre-emptive strikes on you (Axis of Evil rhetoric), then of course you will want to have nuclear power. When a Western government threatens to use nuclear missiles on a neighbour, Iraq (as the US did just prior to the war), and actually uses Weapons of Mass Destruction (Depleted Uranium shells and cluster bombs), then of course you want nuclear power
The Western media always presents the official enemies of Western states as mad and irrational, evil or just plain stupid. Whenever has it been different? Nothing ever changes in that respect. Similarly, the media always presents Western governments as benign and well-intentioned. Are the Iranian government any more irrational and stupid, more self-deceiving or motivated by wild ideas than their Western counterparts? I doubt it. The only difference between the two is that while Iran is trying to obtain nuclear weapons, the West has them already in abundance. That is scary.
I’m pessimistic. I can’t see any governmental solutions arising from any of this. Who has any faith in the UN? Iran, Iraq, Israel, the USA and Britain all regularly ignore UN resolutions. The USA, Israeli and British governments have very little credibility with Middle-Eastern Arab governments (and who can blame them?) - though they continue to do deals. Middle-Eastern governments are completely untrusted by the West (despite the fact that the West installed and continues to maintain most of them).
The only solution in this sort of situation is a negotiated one based on mutual self-interest. Where is that going to come from in the current climate?
But as far as I can see, what is important is not the us and them rhetoric, but the terrible loss of innocent life that has resulted and will continue to result from this whole bloody situation.
Answers on a postcard please…