Page 2 of 2

Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 6:11 pm
by Media Weasel
Koss wrote: Mordeth13 is my hero. I wish I could get away with the things he says and does :laughing:
I think Tiawan's rules are either different - or non-existent.

Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 8:04 pm
by Koss
Media Weasel wrote:
Koss wrote: Mordeth13 is my hero. I wish I could get away with the things he says and does :laughing:
I think Tiawan's rules are either different - or non-existent.
Oh yea, he has an interesting... take on Taiwanese police and laws. Very Interesting.

Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 7:24 am
by qwerty
Merideth13 is quite the entertainer.

Lots of people get confused about countersteering because they are taught to push right to go right. The exact same effect on the bike can be had by pull left to go right. I think countersteering should be taught as bars left to got right. It doesn't matter if you push, pull, or do both.

I've often wondered why we don't crash every time we go through the transition form low-speed handling (counterweighting) to high-speed handling (countersteering). My guess is we use weight transfer to extend the effective speed range of one technique into the speed range of the other. What are your ideas about this.

Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 12:15 pm
by anarchy
qwerty wrote:Lots of people get confused about countersteering because they are taught to push right to go right. The exact same effect on the bike can be had by pull left to go right. I think countersteering should be taught as bars left to got right. It doesn't matter if you push, pull, or do both.
the main reason beginners are taught "push right, go right" and "push left, go left" is because it's easier to remember - right/right, left/left, same side. they already have enough they're trying to learn.