2007 Sportster vs. Bonneville vs. other Standards

Message
Author
User avatar
307T
Elite
Elite
Posts: 106
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 3:16 pm
Sex: Male
Location: Upper left side

#11 Unread post by 307T »

I like standard bikes too. The Bonneville is a nice looking and reasonably well performing bike for its' intended purpose. As the former owner of a 66 Bonneville (and a BSA), I can only say, I'm glad that the Brits finally figured out how to stop the oil leaks.
Back in the saddle again

User avatar
jstark47
Site Supporter - Silver
Site Supporter - Silver
Posts: 3538
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 2:58 pm
Sex: Male
Years Riding: 16
My Motorcycle: '12 Tiger 800, '03 Trophy 1200
Location: Lumberton, NJ

#12 Unread post by jstark47 »

Ian522 wrote:According to this T100 review, triumph may have fuel injection on the Bonnies starting in '08. Don't know how true it is though, id go to a triumph dealer and ask around to make sure.
Lordy, what will the guys on the Bonneville internet forums find to talk about? Two-thirds of all posts are about carb rejetting or tuning!! :laughing: :mrgreen:
2003 Triumph Trophy 1200
2009 BMW F650GS (wife's)
2012 Triumph Tiger 800
2018 Yamaha XT250 (wife's)
2013 Kawasaki KLX250S

schwartzkm
Rookie
Rookie
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 7:50 am

#13 Unread post by schwartzkm »

My dad recently purchased a HD 2k7 1200 sportster in which I quickly put 200 miles on while visiting over thanksgiving vacation. I, too, was in the “which bike to get” category back in 2k5 and ended up not even considering HD sportsters because all the crap that is spewed by stupid and/or ignorant people on forums like this about them (not to mention the HD crowd calling them girls bikes). Bottom line, I would have purchased the sportster if I would have test ridden it over my Bonneville.
Good points:
Very little to know vibration when riding the bike. Where is the paint shaker I always hear about when Sportsters come up? Did HD improve the engine THAT much? If so, don’t worry about the vibration stories because the new ones just don’t have that problem.

Very nice handling. Again, you will hear all the stories about Bonneville ownders eating sportsters in the twisties. That maybe true but that doesn’t mean the sportster can’t hold its own in the twisties it just means the Bonnevilles are a little bit better.

Ergonomins on the bike is just great! I could have easily ridden the bike for hours on end without needing a break. The bike was great.

After-market parts are everywhere and much cheaper than bonnevilles. That is the one really big sore point I have with my Triumph purchase is their aftermarket support. The parts are usually higher and the quality much lower than HD parts.

Bad points:
Brakes. Not that they don’t work but they just don’t have the bite that my Bonneville has.

Price. It will be about 2-3k more than a Bonneville, depending on which model you get.

If I would have test ridden the Sportster, I would not be a Bonneville owner today. Not that the Sportster is that much better, because in many categories the Bonneville beats the sportster, its just the after market accessories and the dealer availability would have swayed me towards HD.

My advice to you is ride one. Eaglerider rents late model HDs for $25.00 an hour or $130.00 a day. I would take on out for an hour or better yet a day and see how you like it.

User avatar
Rydr
Elite
Elite
Posts: 245
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 9:34 am
Sex: Male
Location: West Coast

Sproty verses Bonniville

#14 Unread post by Rydr »

I got to go with the sporty 1200. For my street bikes I'm a long time harley guy. A friend of mine has a 1993 Sportster 1200 that he bought new and has over 155,000 Km's on it. The only thing he has had to do other than regular oil changes, tires, the odd signal light bulb etc. is change the cylinder base gaskets last winter. There was a slight seep on the front gasket. He still has the original belt on the belt drive. My experience with Harleys' has been that they may not be the fastest or the least expensive but they are well made, have very few problems and Harley Davidson supports their product very well.

snwflk303
Regular
Regular
Posts: 37
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2006 10:39 am
Sex: Male
Location: Palm Coast, Fl

Where did the shaking go?

#15 Unread post by snwflk303 »

The HD sportster used to be a hard mounted engine with no rubber cushions at the mounts. The result is that they literaly shook themselves apart (ask any Harley Dealer).

Have you Looked at the Kaw 1600 or Yamaha 1700. the Yam is built to look just like a HD and thousands less. I have a 1600 Nomad and handling in town is easy. I've never ridden a sportster but was put off by the price of the Dyna. And the Suzuki 1300 (I think that is the engine size) is sweet also,

TR7
Elite
Elite
Posts: 109
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 8:22 am
Sex: Male
My Motorcycle: 79 xs600

#16 Unread post by TR7 »

http://www.motorcyclistonline.com/roadt ... omparison/

http://www.chuckhawks.com/bonneville_sportster_w650.htm

Heres a bit of reading I came across. This interests me too, despite my lack of money.... I can always dream :lol:

User avatar
Gummiente
Site Supporter - Platinum
Site Supporter - Platinum
Posts: 3485
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 11:34 pm
Real Name: Mike
Sex: Male
Years Riding: 38
My Motorcycle: 03 Super Glide
Location: Kingston, ON

Re: Where did the shaking go?

#17 Unread post by Gummiente »

snwflk303 wrote:The HD sportster used to be a hard mounted engine with no rubber cushions at the mounts. The result is that they literaly shook themselves apart (ask any Harley Dealer).
Reaaallllyyyy? I put over 120,000km on my '87 XLH1100, but I don't remember it ever shaking itself apart.
snwflk303 wrote:I've never ridden a sportster but was put off by the price of the Dyna.
??? The Dyna isn't a Sportster, dude, it's a totally different model.
:canada: Mike :gummiente:
It isn't WHAT you ride,
It's THAT you ride

User avatar
celt
Elite
Elite
Posts: 215
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 8:01 am
Sex: Male
Location: Central NY

#18 Unread post by celt »

well, i picked up an '07 HD XL1200R the wed. before thanksgiving.

the base retail was only a little bit more than the t100 ($8700 compared to $8200 for new). i know that i could've gotten the '06 t100 for less than retail, but like i said they wouldn't trade. so i would've had to wait until next year when i could sell my bike and by then i'd have to buy an '07 anyhow...

i had the dealer put on SE pipes and air cleaner & since it's EFI i got a race tuner which allows you to remap numerous times if you add/subtract components. i figure the price of all that would be very similar to the cost of adding pipes/ac and that air doohickey removal on the triumph...

so, the fact that HD was able to do a trade and also that i got a 1200 for only a little bit more than a 865, i feel like a got a better deal( for me).

of course the sportster isn't as unique as the t100 (here in the USA), but i figure that i'll feel better about that when i need aftermarket parts and service.

there might be a triumph in my future (or maybe a sportbike even :shock: ) but for the time being i'm happy on my new XL.

thanks for the input, everybody!

User avatar
jazzbiker
Rookie
Rookie
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 11:21 am
Sex: Male
Location: Alexandria, OH

Another alternative

#19 Unread post by jazzbiker »

I'll probably get flamed for pushing Victory's today but assuming your looking at new Triumph's and Sporty's, have you considered a used Victory Vegas?
I've been seeing them for under 10k and they are very cool machines (I am predjudiced)
1504cc, fuel injected, self adjusting valves.....

Probably not as nimble as the Triumph but plenty of power and looks.

Having said that, I think the Triumphs are cool and the new sporty's are probably the best deal HD has going (use to be FLHT before that secret was let out)...

Good Luck,
Dave

"I have no room in my life for a souless motorcycle"

2003 Victory Vegas
2002 Royal Enfield Bullet
2005 Suzuki V-Strom 650 (for sale)

schwartzkm
Rookie
Rookie
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 7:50 am

#20 Unread post by schwartzkm »

I don't think the Vegas has a Standard riding postion therefore would not be considered in this post.

Post Reply