Opinions on Bonneville / Sportster
- jstark47
- Site Supporter - Silver
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 2:58 pm
- Sex: Male
- Years Riding: 16
- My Motorcycle: '12 Tiger 800, '03 Trophy 1200
- Location: Lumberton, NJ
The Bonneville has great character, and is easy to ride. However, to be fair to the Sportster, as a Bonneville owner I have to point out the Bonne needs mods too. Triumph strangled the poor engine to get it through emissions regulations. To get it to sound right and tap into the performance potential, at a minimum you'll have to replace the stock pipes, re-jet, and install a high-flow air filter. Eventually you'll probably want to do something about those cheap price-point suspension components, and unless your butt is made of steel, you'll need a better seat.sx66gns wrote:thanks folks , I'm really doing the research and leaning toward the triumph , it seems to have allot more of what I'm personally looking for , although my family and buddies all ride harleys , the sportster seems like it needs allot of customization right "out of the box".
That's just the beginning, people go nuts modifying these bikes.

2003 Triumph Trophy 1200
2009 BMW F650GS (wife's)
2012 Triumph Tiger 800
2018 Yamaha XT250 (wife's)
2013 Kawasaki KLX250S
2009 BMW F650GS (wife's)
2012 Triumph Tiger 800
2018 Yamaha XT250 (wife's)
2013 Kawasaki KLX250S
- Nalian
- Site Supporter - Platinum
- Posts: 1224
- Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 3:55 am
- Sex: Female
- Years Riding: 5
- My Motorcycle: 2011/BMW/F800R
- Location: Boston, MA
I disagree with that statement - I really think it's pretty rideable from the get go. But, everyone wants something different in a bike, so there you have it. Either way, I don't think you can go wrong with either bike, though, if how you want to ride fits either of the two bikes.sx66gns wrote:thanks folks , I'm really doing the research and leaning toward the triumph , it seems to have allot more of what I'm personally looking for , although my family and buddies all ride harleys , the sportster seems like it needs allot of customization right "out of the box".
I meant pipes that sound good , forward controls , I hear complaint after complaint about the seat and the need to add a rear seat.Nalian wrote:I disagree with that statement - I really think it's pretty rideable from the get go. But, everyone wants something different in a bike, so there you have it. Either way, I don't think you can go wrong with either bike, though, if how you want to ride fits either of the two bikes.sx66gns wrote:thanks folks , I'm really doing the research and leaning toward the triumph , it seems to have allot more of what I'm personally looking for , although my family and buddies all ride harleys , the sportster seems like it needs allot of customization right "out of the box".
thanks for the links , and you've just said about the Bonneville what I normally heard about the sportster..jstark47 wrote:The Bonneville has great character, and is easy to ride. However, to be fair to the Sportster, as a Bonneville owner I have to point out the Bonne needs mods too. Triumph strangled the poor engine to get it through emissions regulations. To get it to sound right and tap into the performance potential, at a minimum you'll have to replace the stock pipes, re-jet, and install a high-flow air filter. Eventually you'll probably want to do something about those cheap price-point suspension components, and unless your butt is made of steel, you'll need a better seat.sx66gns wrote:thanks folks , I'm really doing the research and leaning toward the triumph , it seems to have allot more of what I'm personally looking for , although my family and buddies all ride harleys , the sportster seems like it needs allot of customization right "out of the box".
That's just the beginning, people go nuts modifying these bikes.Check the http://www.bellacorse.com/ and http://www.newbonneville.com/index.html sites and you'll see what I mean!
So let's say you have 8,000 allocated for a bike , should I just go ahead and plan for another 2,000 for either choice in accessories?
there's no way i'd ever put forwards on a Bonnie.sx66gns wrote:
I meant pipes that sound good , forward controls , I hear complaint after complaint about the seat and the need to add a rear seat.
in fact, i really don't like the sporty customs with the forwards or the bonny America either.
but that is solely my opinion and most Americans disagree.
to me the sporty and bonny should be mid or rear mounts...nimble and quick handling in the corners...that's the beauty of them...
if i were you i'd ride them both with midmounts before making any rash decision about forward controls...

edit: unless you're really tall, that is...