Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 6:41 pm
I have no idea about the performance of either bike, but on looks alone the Rocker is a MUCH better looking bike than the Raider.
25 Years. 425 Million Readers. 54 years of Motorcycle Guides ∙ Reviews ∙ The friendliest motorcycle community on the internet!
https://www.totalmotorcycle.com/BBS/
Really the only thing I like better about the Rocker is the gas tank / triple tree relationship.NewGuy wrote:I have no idea about the performance of either bike, but on looks alone the Rocker is a MUCH better looking bike than the Raider.
It's too small, the tank that is, it doesn't fit the bike, too much open space between the front of the tank and the bars. Looks as if they ran out of budget when designing the tank and just slapped on one that sort of fit and they had available. A fuller and heaftier looking tank is needed on a bike of that caliber and styling. It reminds me of a Harley Fatboy would look like if was fitted with one of the smaller Sportster tank. Just doesn't look right.blackmouth wrote:I've only seen it on the net.
Didn't really like what I saw of it online, but I'm trying to reserve my judgement until I see it in person.
The pics online may not do it justice but from what I've seen, I don't like the pipes. Plus there's something "off" about the area in front of the gas tank (can't put my finger on it, but don't like it).
She left out the review partFlipper wrote:Susan Carpenter reviewed it in the Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago.
http://www.latimes.com/classified/autom ... 7758.story
Here are more of her reviews for your winter reading pleasure.
http://www.latimes.com/classified/autom ... orygallery
This is a joke, right?Venarius wrote:Nope, your all wrong, its a copied Honda VLX with a Bigger, air cooled engine!