Page 2 of 3

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 6:41 pm
by NewGuy
I have no idea about the performance of either bike, but on looks alone the Rocker is a MUCH better looking bike than the Raider.

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 7:15 pm
by beardking
NewGuy wrote:I have no idea about the performance of either bike, but on looks alone the Rocker is a MUCH better looking bike than the Raider.
Really the only thing I like better about the Rocker is the gas tank / triple tree relationship.

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 7:22 pm
by ceemes
blackmouth wrote:I've only seen it on the net.
Didn't really like what I saw of it online, but I'm trying to reserve my judgement until I see it in person.

The pics online may not do it justice but from what I've seen, I don't like the pipes. Plus there's something "off" about the area in front of the gas tank (can't put my finger on it, but don't like it).
It's too small, the tank that is, it doesn't fit the bike, too much open space between the front of the tank and the bars. Looks as if they ran out of budget when designing the tank and just slapped on one that sort of fit and they had available. A fuller and heaftier looking tank is needed on a bike of that caliber and styling. It reminds me of a Harley Fatboy would look like if was fitted with one of the smaller Sportster tank. Just doesn't look right.

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 6:51 am
by Dennis
The Rocker (IMO) looks a little better, but the Rocker is some 6 or 7 grand more than the Raider. That may sway a lot of peoples decision on their purchase.

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 8:08 am
by NorthernPete
Also seemS pretty similar to the Vulcan 900 Custom

Image
Image

I am a fan of pegs vs floorboards on both as well.

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 8:16 am
by Flipper
Susan Carpenter reviewed it in the Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago.
http://www.latimes.com/classified/autom ... 7758.story

Here are more of her reviews for your winter reading pleasure.

http://www.latimes.com/classified/autom ... orygallery

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 8:42 am
by jonnythan
Flipper wrote:Susan Carpenter reviewed it in the Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago.
http://www.latimes.com/classified/autom ... 7758.story

Here are more of her reviews for your winter reading pleasure.

http://www.latimes.com/classified/autom ... orygallery
She left out the review part ;)

Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 5:50 am
by Venarius
Nope, your all wrong, its a copied Honda VLX with a Bigger, air cooled engine!

Image

Image

Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 6:02 am
by jonnythan
Venarius wrote:Nope, your all wrong, its a copied Honda VLX with a Bigger, air cooled engine!
This is a joke, right?

Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:27 am
by badinfluence63
Venarius,

Being wrong isn't a bad thing ....is it? :laughing: