Page 2 of 4

Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 10:10 am
by HYPERR
Brackstone wrote:
Well maybe I misunderstood but isn't the B-King tuned more like my shiver and the V-Max more like a cruiser?
If the new Max is indeed going to be putting out anything near 200 horses, it will spank the B-King beyond belief. Suzuki may have to go back to the Supercharger ala original concept B-King after all. :mrgreen:

Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 10:15 am
by HYPERR
Big B wrote:the v-max is not like a cruiser

standard riding position and it makes an amazing amount of power at higher rpms.

if it's any more comfortable than the previous v-max's i think i may have found my next bike (that or the softail cross bones :drool2: )
The Max is a Power Cruiser. A genre originally created by the Honda V65 Magna and permanently defined by the V-Max.

The original Max had a ton of torque as well as insane HP at the top as you said when the V-Boost kicked in. The unusual combination of busload of torque and the Hi-RPM HP made the Max an insane bike to ride.

Re: 2009 Yamaha V-Max!

Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 1:41 pm
by Bubbas_brother
2wheel wrote:70 more hp than the previous model:

www.2wheelcentral.com
After getting to http://www.2wheelcentral.com/09vmax.htm I didn't see any pictures.

Re: 2009 Yamaha V-Max!

Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 1:46 pm
by HYPERR
Bubbas_brother wrote:
2wheel wrote:70 more hp than the previous model:

www.2wheelcentral.com
After getting to http://www.2wheelcentral.com/09vmax.htm I didn't see any pictures.
Image

Image

Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 2:00 pm
by jstark47
bandit600 wrote:It's a little less ugly than the B-King...
Like root canal is a "little" less painful than bamboo shoots under the fingernails? They're both hideous!!! :disgust:

Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 2:06 pm
by 02custominfl
While it's not exactly beautiful, if you're not on it all you'll ever see is the back anyway

Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 4:54 pm
by Grey Thumper
Something weird about the proportion of the engine to everything else. But I guess that's sorta the point.

Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 4:59 pm
by jonnythan
I think it's just way, way overdesigned. The details are just way too busy. The engine covers, headlight housing, multi-piece front fender, etc etc. There are all sorts of little extraneous details and silly design bits that just make it ugly.

Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 5:00 pm
by RhadamYgg
Looks like more bike than I'll ever be able to handle... Or afford for that matter.

RhadamYgg

Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 5:26 pm
by KingRobb
even uglier than before...but 200 horse :shock: strip it down and run drags on it.