Page 2 of 3

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2005 12:35 pm
by ZooTech
You mean...like this?

Image

:laughing:

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 11:52 am
by chris66
almost like that, but the m50 has the blacked out engine as well. Plus the new kawis werent out. The ms's I saw had the polished wheels

Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 3:00 am
by funinaz
Zootech,

Is that a picture of the new Kawa 900? That's sweeeeeet looking!

Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 3:46 am
by ZooTech
funinaz wrote:Zootech,

Is that a picture of the new Kawa 900? That's sweeeeeet looking!
Nope. That's the 2006 Mean Streak.

Here's the 900 Classic:

Image
Image

Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 1:14 am
by MotoF150
I own an M50 ,,,,its uncomfortable,,,, that low seat with the straight handlebars you have to stretch ur whole body to ride it, and it has good acceleration from a stop but its not fast. The M50 is a cheap made bike, Suzuki cuts all the cost on materials when they made it, plastic valve covers cheap IRC tires, cheap single front disc brake caliper, old fashioned rear shoe brakes that never work, the LED tail light is dim, nobody sees ur brake lights, the kickstand is too weak to hold the bike, the gas cap doesn't seal and there is a constant smell of gas, the cheap foot pegs and brake pegs, the plastic rear engine covers scratch from the rocks the front fender is too small that doesnt protect the raidator from the rocks and mud, the seat is too soft and uncomfortable, handling is rough, this bike takes a lot of work and skill to ride, it very unforgiving if for one second you take ur eyes off the road, you don't steer this bike, you have to physicially fight and push on the handlebars to steer it, ur body weight doesn't affect the handling of the bike, its a tough bike to ride, its horrible on any ride non stop over 50 miles.

Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 3:43 am
by Andrew
Other than the little accesories(backrest, saddlebags, windshield), what are the major differences between the C50T and the M50?

Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 5:38 am
by Ninja Geoff
MotoF150 wrote:I own an M50 ,,,,its uncomfortable,,,, that low seat with the straight handlebars you have to stretch ur whole body to ride it, and it has good acceleration from a stop but its not fast. The M50 is a cheap made bike, Suzuki cuts all the cost on materials when they made it, plastic valve covers cheap IRC tires, cheap single front disc brake caliper, old fashioned rear shoe brakes that never work, the LED tail light is dim, nobody sees ur brake lights, the kickstand is too weak to hold the bike, the gas cap doesn't seal and there is a constant smell of gas, the cheap foot pegs and brake pegs, the plastic rear engine covers scratch from the rocks the front fender is too small that doesnt protect the raidator from the rocks and mud, the seat is too soft and uncomfortable, handling is rough, this bike takes a lot of work and skill to ride, it very unforgiving if for one second you take ur eyes off the road, you don't steer this bike, you have to physicially fight and push on the handlebars to steer it, ur body weight doesn't affect the handling of the bike, its a tough bike to ride, its horrible on any ride non stop over 50 miles.
Andrew, please ignore this troll. He's the idjit who bought a bike that doesn't fit him.

Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 6:16 am
by Andrew
Geoff, his opinion definetely seems to be the minority one. Not everybody will like every bike...

Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 9:55 am
by NorthernPete
he doesnt like anything.... :laughing:

Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 5:51 pm
by Sev
NorthernPete wrote:he doesnt like anything.... :laughing:
He likes ATVing, but he hangs around on a motorcycle forum.