msvaughan wrote:I have wondered about starting out with a smaller bike, but everyone I have talked to recently has stated (Not just sales guys either) that I could start with this size and get used to it and be comfortable. Rather than start smaller, then in 6 months wish I had bought bigger. My friend is wanting to move from his 750 up to the VTX1800 when he gets back from Iraq.
Yes I think I am responsible, I will be 35 next month, so I am not a young guy with speed on my brain and wanting to just go blasting down the street at 100mph. I want style, comfort and the option of adding some personal touch to a bike when I am ready.
I can afford the Harley, but for 6k more, I am having a hard time justifying the Harley, especially when many people are telling me the Honda has more power stock anyway.
I like them both, I really do. Right now for 6k less, I am leaning towards the Honda learning to ride it.
Since I am still learning this too, how about:
1.) The shaft drive of Honda VS the belt drive of Harley? Should that be a consideration?
2.) liquid cooled VS Air cooled?
3.) Honda comes Carbed, Harley had the option of EFI or Carb, should that be a consideration?
And again, I appreciate all you taking time to respond to me.
1.) The drive train, like so much else is a personal matter. If you are planning on modifying your bike at some point in the future, the belt drive has more options available. The shaft drive is better for long term reliability, but the belt drive will be good for approximaely 50,000 miles (80,000km). Maintenance for both is very easy.
2.) Air cooled means there are fewer thing that can go wrong, but the drawback is higher operating temps in heavy traffic situations and on hot days when the air density thins out. This is not a problem in 99% of your riding. Water cooled has the advantages of better heat control in heavy traffic situations, and ambient air conditions have little or no bearing on the engines operating temps. Because of the more precise temperature controls, engine manufacturing tolerances can be tighter and that provides greater performance per volume. The downside is higher maintenance of the cooling system needed to keep it in optimal condition.
3.) EFI vs. Carbs can have a big impact in many ways depending on where you live. Properly mapped, EFI gives better control to the fuel metering system which can reduce exhaust emmisions while maintaining high specific output performance. If you live in a high polution area where vehicles are required to pass emmision tests regularly, then EFI is the way to go. Carbs are easier for Joe Sixpack to understand because they are the standard fuel system on most vehicles, thoug that will probably change asexhaust emission standards are increasingly tightened. If you plan on doing any track time (road racing or drag racing) then carbs are your best current option as they are more easily tunable for track conditions.
As for your initial question about larger vs. smaller, ask yourself several questions; what your riding style will be, will you be carrying a passenger, what are your physical comfort needs (are you a large, or long legged, person), what are your performance expectations. If it was me, and I was new to riding as you are, I would look at my friend's 750 as a learning bike. It is a full sized motorcycle and can carry two up for short distances. It will only seem "down on power" to an experienced biker, not a newbie like yourself. At this point, you only have the desire to ride. Before investing too much money, find out on something less expensive whether you actually enjoy motorcycling. I have known a couple of people who got all excited about motorcycling until they actually did some riding and found out that it was just not their cup of tea after spending large sums of money. They lost quite a bit of their investment because of depreciation. I do hope you enjoy your biking experience and become a lifer like me. If you do, you can trade up from that 750 anytime in the future. Welcome to the family, I hope your stay here is a long one.