Page 2 of 3

Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 3:21 pm
by ZooTech
Ho hum....that'd be a nice little scooter to get around the campground.

Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 3:39 pm
by Sev
ZooTech wrote:
Sevulturus wrote:My first bike as a LS650 that pumped out
33hp and 20 some ft/lbs of torque, are you saying that isn't good enough?
Let's see...the 599 has 47.4 ft/lbs of torque and 88hp so.......
Have you ever seen me give someone a hard time over what bike they ride? Including the Harleys.

Have you ever seen me brag about the power my bike outputs? No. I'm saying you don't need to have the biggest baddest best bike out there to have fun.

And the implication that I couldn't have had fun on my bike that is less powerful then the best out there doesn't mean it's any less enjoyable. Or any less a bike.

I have the same respect for the guy on the savage as I do for the guy on the meanstreak...

Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 3:43 pm
by Wizzard
Altho I have never owned one , I think that side cars are way too kewl . It takes a different kind of rider for that kind of riding . And any brother or sister with their knees in the breeze regardless of the ride is definitely a kindred spirit ......... :wink:
Da Wizz

Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 3:51 pm
by ZooTech
Sevulturus wrote:
ZooTech wrote:
Sevulturus wrote:My first bike as a LS650 that pumped out
33hp and 20 some ft/lbs of torque, are you saying that isn't good enough?
Let's see...the 599 has 47.4 ft/lbs of torque and 88hp so.......
Have you ever seen me give someone a hard time over what bike they ride? Including the Harleys.

Have you ever seen me brag about the power my bike outputs? No. I'm saying you don't need to have the biggest baddest best bike out there to have fun.

And the implication that I couldn't have had fun on my bike that is less powerful then the best out there doesn't mean it's any less enjoyable. Or any less a bike.

I have the same respect for the guy on the savage as I do for the guy on the meanstreak...
Settle down, Bubba, I was just pointing out a wee bit of irony in your post! :laughing:

Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 3:54 pm
by Mintbread
ZooTech wrote: Settle down, Bubba, I was just pointing out a wee bit of irony in your post!
I recall you got your undies a little twisted when I did the same with your sig... :lol:

Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 3:59 pm
by ZooTech
Mintbread wrote:
ZooTech wrote: Settle down, Bubba, I was just pointing out a wee bit of irony in your post!
I recall you got your undies a little twisted when I did the same with your sig... :lol:
Indeed, but that was because I never saw the irony. It said, "I like my chicken strips extra thin" and mine were maybe 1/4" wide at the time. What'd I miss???

Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 4:12 pm
by vega44
Image

......... :shock: can a sport bike do that?

Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 4:19 pm
by Mintbread
ZooTech wrote: Indeed, but that was because I never saw the irony. It said, "I like my chicken strips extra thin" and mine were maybe 1/4" wide at the time. What'd I miss???
I guess it comes down to personal perspective. To me 1/4" is wide.

Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 4:33 pm
by ronboskz650sr
lowlux wrote:Image

......... :shock: can a sport bike do that?
EeeeeeeHah! Nice gear, too!

Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 4:38 pm
by ZooTech
Mintbread wrote:
ZooTech wrote: Indeed, but that was because I never saw the irony. It said, "I like my chicken strips extra thin" and mine were maybe 1/4" wide at the time. What'd I miss???
I guess it comes down to personal perspective. To me 1/4" is wide.
Well, considering the fact that they were 1/4" wide even after sending sparks flying off my pegs I'm not sure what more I can do to appease you. I'm sure you'll be happy to know they were completely gone after my trip to The Dragon, but only after pinching my boots against the frame during some hard, prolonged leaning.