Page 2 of 2
Domain Names
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 7:33 pm
by Dirtytoes
ex500 ofcourse!
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 8:57 pm
by chemicalpoet
I really like the 500's for some reason. Hmm, I do remember reading somewhere that the EX was a smudge? "better", but the Suzy will probably be a little easier to maintain *air cooled*. I do like them both, and are some of the better racing twins IMHO.
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 10:32 pm
by WanTeD
chemicalpoet wrote:I really like the 500's for some reason. Hmm, I do remember reading somewhere that the EX was a smudge? "better", but the Suzy will probably be a little easier to maintain *air cooled*. I do like them both, and are some of the better racing twins IMHO.
Yeah about maintenance, is maintaining an water cooled bike much harder/costy compared to maintaining an air cooled bike?
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 10:56 pm
by Sev
not particularly
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 11:31 pm
by WanTeD
Found this:
http://www.mcnews.com/mcn/model_eval/Ni ... aro07a.pdf
Edit: What's the "positive neutral finder" ?
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 4:30 am
by gsJack
After you read that MCN comparo you might want to read this thread:
http://totalmotorcycle.com/BBS/viewtopi ... sc&start=0
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 5:32 am
by 2wheel
My girlfriend and I just went through this comparison. Both are good bikes, what it came down to was comfort and looks.
She went for the Suzuki.