650 CC Vs 1100 CC

Message
Author
User avatar
Kal
Site Supporter - Gold
Site Supporter - Gold
Posts: 2554
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:08 am
Real Name: Jade
Sex: Female
Years Riding: 14
My Motorcycle: 1998 Kawasaki GPZ500S
Location: Nottingham, UK

#11 Unread post by Kal »

jfeaz wrote:Everybody told me the same thing - start with the 650, so I did. One note though...I bought my v-star 650 in L.A. while I was visiting at L.A. Yamaha Aprilia in Marina del Rey. I rode around in L.A. for the 2 weeks I was there and put 750 miles on the bike.

When I got it home (by trailer) to where I live in Colorado at 7,500 feet, the reduction in power due to thinner air was very apparent.

So if you live at a high elevation, a larger displacement might do you a little better.
Isn't there a mod you can do to make the engine breathe easier at altitude? I'm sure I read something along those lines...
Kal...
Relationship Squid...

GPZ500S, CB250N, GB250Clubman

User avatar
flynrider
Legendary 2000
Legendary 2000
Posts: 2391
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 1:36 pm
Sex: Male
Years Riding: 30
My Motorcycle: '93 Honda Nighthawk 750
Location: Phoenix, AZ

#12 Unread post by flynrider »

Kal wrote: Isn't there a mod you can do to make the engine breathe easier at altitude? I'm sure I read something along those lines...
Bikes sold at high altitudes are usually set up at the dealership with leaner jets in the carbs. If you take a bike that was bought at sea level to your home at 7,500 ft., it would probably benefit by having a jet kit installed. It's almost certainly running too rich.

That said, other than turbocharging, there's not much you can do about the inherent power loss, due to altitude. There's a lot less oxygen by volume. This gets even worse in the summertime. As the air gets warmer, it gets even less dense. On an average day, you're looking at a 25% power reduction at 7,500 ft. On a warm summer day, it'll be closer to 40%.
Bikin' John
'93 Honda CB750 Nighthawk

Post Reply