Sevulturus wrote:
So... we're taking a lighter bike, and dropping a twitchy throttle onto it. Why do we not recomend supersports again? Ohhh, that's right, they're relatively light, and they are really responsive on the clutch/throttle."
Are you seriously putting single-cylinder 125cc two strokes in the same category as 600cc inline fours? PLEASE tell me you're not trying to take it down that route.
Sevulturus wrote:
I've ridden around for a bit on a ninja 250 that puts out a whopping 26HP to the rear wheel. Yes, that's right a ninja 250 has 26 bhp, though it's higher at the crank.
The rating I always heard for a Ninja 250 was 36HP. That may be the rating at the crank, and I don't doubt the same is true for these 125's.
Sevulturus wrote:
What I'm getting at here, is that just because it's a little bike doesn't mean it's a good bike to be riding. Isn't MotoGP dropping down to 250's sometime in the near future... does that mean those would be good bikes to learn on?
You want to learn on a 2-stroke, get a dirtbike.
Okay, so MotoGP is moving to highly modified bikes of twice the displacement of what we're talking about. That has nothing to do with the thread and mentioning it is just silly. That's the equivalent of saying "Don't get a Ninja 250! Those MotoGP guys use 500's and those aren't good beginner bikes!"
Since pretty much everyone here is just talking out of their "O Ring", is there anyone that has ridden one of these things and can comment on how "twitchy" the throttle response is? I can't see it being too terribly bad, although the *POWER DELIVERY* may scare the hell outta some n00bs.