Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 8:28 pm
I think thats just how my generation speaks...DivideOverflow wrote:No offense dude, but you come off as a lot younger than 23. I would have guessed 17-18 based on your posts.
Total Motorcycle Community Forums
25 Years. 425 Million Readers. 54 years of Motorcycle Guides ∙ Reviews ∙ The friendliest motorcycle community on the internet!
https://www.totalmotorcycle.com/BBS/
I Almost got HIT
Page 3 of 5
Re: LOL
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 2:23 am
You might want to proof your messages before you send them. Use full sentences, separated into paragraphs, and watch your grammar. Electronic communication is not the place to write in all slang and urban-speak (if there is such a word). I recommend you pick up a book on effective communication through email, it would certainly help.silentx wrote:
LOL...What did I say to make you think I was 17?
.
Minor mispellings and errors are easily forgiven on a message board, but once you start sending business emails you are going to be a joke if you continue to write like that.
On topic, stop lane-splitting. Take the MSF, ride carefully. You are trying to accomplish too much for your level of experience.
PS: Smileys are for indicating the mood of your posts. Generally one per post is sufficient. You should only use another one if you have a paragraph that you need to emphasize one mood over the general feel of the post. A laughing smiley following a LOL is redundant.
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:00 am
I'm embarrased for my generation.Koss wrote:I think thats just how my generation speaks...DivideOverflow wrote:No offense dude, but you come off as a lot younger than 23. I would have guessed 17-18 based on your posts.
I'm 23 and I thought he was 16 or 17.
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:02 am
I choose neither, but would rather have the lane splitting option to get out of slow traffic. Being rear ended would do as much if not worse damage than what you listed above.Sevulturus wrote:I'd rather get hit from behind. Worst case you go flying forwards over the handlebars potentially... but not likely to shatter your femur as you're moving from a stop. It's also possible, maybe even likely you will end up under the car... depends upon the vehicle height and the bike type plus it's construction.The Crimson Rider® wrote:which is worse?Sevulturus wrote:Lane splitting sounds like a good way to get squeezed out and summarily "messed".
getting squeezed from... left and right? or front and back?
i think i'll take getting side-swiped over being rear-ended.
Alternately you can get squeezed between two vehicles or get sideswiped, or go into someones front end as they pull in front of you.
Case one, you probably just had both of your legs crushed into the frame
Case two, you just had one leg crushed into the frame, and you're sliding down the road with potentially the other leg under your bike (as you're not travelling overly quickly)
Case three, you just shattered both femurs as they slammed into your clip ons as you summersaulted over the hood of whatever car just got his front end into your path.
Any time you put yourself in a position where there is little room to manevour/little clearance you are asking to get messed up. Especially when your only way out (going forwards) can be blocked very easily.
Just as this guy. He probably had a lot worse than a shattered femur.
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:12 am
It's amazing what'll happen when you stop in the middle of the highway. BAM.
Then again, we were talking about being stopped in traffic, where everyone is going to be going at a fairly slow pace, AND if you're paying attention to what's going on behind you... you can avoid someone rear ending you by pulling forwards and beside whatever vehicle stopped in front of you.
I've personally done that on two occasions in my riding career. It all comes down to situational awareness.
Then again, we were talking about being stopped in traffic, where everyone is going to be going at a fairly slow pace, AND if you're paying attention to what's going on behind you... you can avoid someone rear ending you by pulling forwards and beside whatever vehicle stopped in front of you.
I've personally done that on two occasions in my riding career. It all comes down to situational awareness.
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:16 am
Yea... im 23 and I admit, when I first started reading his posts... I also thought he had to have been at most 18.Sevulturus wrote:I'm embarrased for my generation.Koss wrote:I think thats just how my generation speaks...DivideOverflow wrote:No offense dude, but you come off as a lot younger than 23. I would have guessed 17-18 based on your posts.
I'm 23 and I thought he was 16 or 17.
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:24 am
What's wrong with that? I'm 17, do I sound completely ignorant?
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:46 am
Ok to be more fair, there is a tendency in my generation to have the want or need to slaughter our written language. And yes, there are those who defy the current trend. Thank you, and keep on fightin' cam!camthepyro wrote:What's wrong with that? I'm 17, do I sound completely ignorant?
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:47 am
Very true. You need to be aware of your situation and how to react as stuff arises. And I've pulled away to avoid trouble myself once.Sevulturus wrote:It's amazing what'll happen when you stop in the middle of the highway. BAM.
Then again, we were talking about being stopped in traffic, where everyone is going to be going at a fairly slow pace, AND if you're paying attention to what's going on behind you... you can avoid someone rear ending you by pulling forwards and beside whatever vehicle stopped in front of you.
I've personally done that on two occasions in my riding career. It all comes down to situational awareness.
But I still think even in stopped traffic you can be seriously hurt from being rear ended. You can probably tell what the car approaching behind you is doing, and the one behind that. But after that it starts to get more difficult to tell. And if that 3rd car back slams into the one in front of it, creating a domino affect, I believe you could get crunched and pinned from the affects of that happening.
Not trying to be argumentative, just saying that both options have their risk and hazards and one is not necessarily safer than the other. (Taking into account where lanesplitting is a legal and accepted practice, that is.)
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:58 am
I've seen some pretty bad crunches from people in 15mph traffic jams. People tend to slam on the gas for some reason, I suspect often to keep others from cutting into the lane in front of them. One second of wandering attention and smack, a 30mph accident in 15mph traffic.