Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 4:02 am
15gb of mp3s? How many songs is that? I hear about those new 80gb ipods and I just can't imagine there being enough songs in the world to fill it.
25 Years. 425 Million Readers. 54 years of Motorcycle Guides ∙ Reviews ∙ The friendliest motorcycle community on the internet!
https://www.totalmotorcycle.com/BBS/
The new iPods allow you to playback video and store pictures as well. A movie is typically 700mb, or 1.3gb depending upon the quality it was ripped at. It can make it up to 4gigs if it's DVD-R quality. So the storage space gets eaten up fast.CNF2002 wrote:15gb of mp3s? How many songs is that? I hear about those new 80gb ipods and I just can't imagine there being enough songs in the world to fill it.
Right, but do you need full screen DVD-R quality on a 2-3 inch screen? You could get away with alot of resizing and compression if you want to convert a movie to play on an ipod, I would think.Sevulturus wrote:The new iPods allow you to playback video and store pictures as well. A movie is typically 700mb, or 1.3gb depending upon the quality it was ripped at. It can make it up to 4gigs if it's DVD-R quality. So the storage space gets eaten up fast.CNF2002 wrote:15gb of mp3s? How many songs is that? I hear about those new 80gb ipods and I just can't imagine there being enough songs in the world to fill it.
I've got the better part of a terrabyte of storage now, though some of it is redundant. I keep all my songs on three different HD's and my favorite movies as well. One of my HD's isn't even installed, I sub it into my usb case once a month and copy over new files, then it goes back into the anti-static bag and in my drawer. Paranoid I know, but the stuff I have on there took YEARS to acquire, so it's worth the extra effort, as I'd never get it all back.
I lost a years worth of family photos because a HD went down, so those also live on three HD's. It's funny because annoying as hardcopy photos are, they're a lot harder to destroy then digital ones.
I can easily hear the difference between 128kbps and 192kbps MP3s on my headphones, in my car, and even more clearly on my home theater system. I encode everything I personally rip at 192 and try to download everything the same way. Sometimes I'll have to find the album in FLAC (lossess) format and then uncompress it to encode it at 192.CNF2002 wrote:I run all my mp3s at 94. Much smaller and I dont notice any sound difference.
lol, maybe. I record all my mp3s from streaming net radio, which is usually streamed at 128 and I compress it down even further to save space. My phone uses an SD card to store mp3s so I went with the cheapo 256 instead of a gig unit that would have cost me $100+. Don't own or buy CDs, so I don't have the ability to convert any high sound quality stuff.jonnythan wrote:I can easily hear the difference between 128kbps and 192kbps MP3s on my headphones, in my car, and even more clearly on my home theater system. I encode everything I personally rip at 192 and try to download everything the same way. Sometimes I'll have to find the album in FLAC (lossess) format and then uncompress it to encode it at 192.CNF2002 wrote:I run all my mp3s at 94. Much smaller and I dont notice any sound difference.