scanevalexec wrote:Toyuzu wrote:I've talked with you about this before, Scav. I think we both know where the other stands. I know you've read the Bible, but you seem to have forgotten that a great deal of it contains stories detailing God exacting death on those deserving, sometimes even through the hands of His followers.
You know I've agreed to try to stay clear of this issue, but I'll say one thing in regards to the Bible and God exacting death. The new testament was a new chapter for the relationship between God and man. If Christ had not walked this earth, I'd agree with you, but Jesus had another plan. Passivism was his way.
Passivism, while a noble concept and most of the time the best response is more of a modern, new-age concept. Even Christ was not completely passive. remember the clearing of the temple?
scanevalexec wrote:Turn the other cheek was not just a one situation idea. If you are a Christian, truely Christ-like, you take the kicking without kicking back - and the meek shall get their returns. You should believe fully in the concept of meeting up with God and Jesus afterwards and your rewards for your pain and suffering will be the seat at their side.
I agree with you there. It's a concept that is new to me in it's extreme sense, when applied to all facets of life. Even Christians continue to learn God's will throughout their lives. We humans tend to react defensively when harmed. In almost all occasions, I believe God wants us to turn the other cheek. However, there are exceptions, even in the new testament. God charges particularly men to be protectors of their families, and leaders to be protectors of those they lead.
Do you think God would really want Bush to react to the twin towers tragedy, by saying "here you go, Al Queda - here's another couple of jets, and the Sears tower is right there in Chicago."
That may be a bit extreme, but you see my point? The fact is noone can say for sure what God's explicit will is save God himself. Those of us who believe in Him must simply follow the leading of His Spirit in our lives, and make every choice as best we can based on that leading.
That leading in my life gives me confidence that George is a good leader. I still don't understand the war, or the loss of life. However, I'm content to trust My Creator with that which I don't understand.
scanevalexec wrote:And as far as God in the roll of smiter of the evil, unless you think God is having a direct conversation with someone about doing his bidding, I just don't see how this mission is more one of God than any other military operation. Christianity has always managed to forget Christ when they don't want to suffer on this earth and feel they are more right than someone else.
Christianity does not forget God. Humans, who have a sin nature forget God. Don't blame the failures of people who claim to be Christians on God. Christians aren't perfect, just forgiven, remember? I believe God does speak directly to people. Not the audible voice from heaven, like people enjoy laughing about, but more a gentle prodding by His spirit, to those who are close enough to Him to hear. He speaks through prayer, and reading His word. I have experienced this myself.
scanevalexec wrote:The crazy terrorist also think they are working for God. Our response is agressive. How else could you do it? I don't know. This might be the right way, but I doubt it has God's seal of aproval.
At least the way I've read it.
Some things will never be understood while on earth. I hope you don't think I'm trying to start a debate. I rarely do this because that is usually what people think. I just felt the need to convey my own personal reasons for what I believe. I know my opinion is not a popular one, but I'm not ashamed of what I believe, and I'm not afraid to share it. I do try to pick the right time though, and to share without seeming like I'm trying to "shove it down anyone's throat".