Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 4:55 pm
I got curious about stopping distance because in my mind and in my experience a bike stops WAY faster than a car. But low and behold the data does not support my perception. Wrider is indeed correct.
Cars 70 - 0 MPH
Chevrolet Malibu ...... 170 ft. (51.82M)
Dodge Avenger ........ 178 ft. (54.25M)
Ford Fusion .............. 172 ft. (52.43M)
Honda Accord EX ...... 169 ft. (51.51M)
Hyundai Sonata ........ 171 ft. (52.12M)
Nissan Altima 2.5s .... 168 ft. (51.20M)
Toyota Camry LE ...... 170 ft. (51.82M)
Bikes 70 - 0 MPH
Ducati 749 ................ 167 ft. (50.83M)
Yamaha R6 ............... 177 ft. (53.89M)
Source1
Source2
What I take from this is not to overvalue the brakes on my bike in comparison to those of a car. These are fairly average cars, and I'd imagine bikes not in this class will have considerably longer stopping distances.
P.S. Paul here's wishing your friend's daughter a full and speedy recovery.
Cars 70 - 0 MPH
Chevrolet Malibu ...... 170 ft. (51.82M)
Dodge Avenger ........ 178 ft. (54.25M)
Ford Fusion .............. 172 ft. (52.43M)
Honda Accord EX ...... 169 ft. (51.51M)
Hyundai Sonata ........ 171 ft. (52.12M)
Nissan Altima 2.5s .... 168 ft. (51.20M)
Toyota Camry LE ...... 170 ft. (51.82M)
Bikes 70 - 0 MPH
Ducati 749 ................ 167 ft. (50.83M)
Yamaha R6 ............... 177 ft. (53.89M)
Source1
Source2
What I take from this is not to overvalue the brakes on my bike in comparison to those of a car. These are fairly average cars, and I'd imagine bikes not in this class will have considerably longer stopping distances.
P.S. Paul here's wishing your friend's daughter a full and speedy recovery.