Another motorcycle maufacturer goes down today. - Page 3 - Total Motorcycle Community Forums
BACK TO TOTAL MOTORCYCLE - DAILY MOTORCYCLE NEWS - MOTORCYCLE MODEL REVIEW GUIDES

Total Motorcycle Community Forums

26 Years. 430 Million Readers. 54 years of Motorcycle Guides ∙ Reviews ∙ The friendliest motorcycle community on the internet!

Skip to content

Advanced search
  • Quick links
    • Unanswered topics
    • Active topics
    • Search
  • FAQ
  • Login
  • Register
  • Board index Total Motorcycle Talk Forums Total Motorcycle Talk
  • Search
  • Unanswered topics
  • Active topics

Another motorcycle maufacturer goes down today.

Post Reply
  • Print view
Advanced search
83 posts
  • Page 3 of 9
    • Jump to page:
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • …
  • 9
  • Next

Do you think another motorcycle manufacturer will go down in 2010?

Yes
9
60%
No
4
27%
Yes, but I'm thinking 2 or more.
2
13%
 
Total votes: 15
Your vote has been cast.

Message
Author
User avatar
Gummiente
Site Supporter - Platinum
Site Supporter - Platinum
Posts: 3485
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 11:34 pm
Real Name: Mike
Sex: Male
Years Riding: 38
My Motorcycle: 03 Super Glide
Location: Kingston, ON

Re: Another motorcycle maufacturer goes down today.

  • Quote

#21 Post by Gummiente » Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:40 am

HYPERR wrote:Hydraulic valves are hardly a high tech item. Also it can only be used in low performance low revving motorcycle engines. As you know, it will pump up at high rpms so it cannot be used to most of today's high rpm high performance motorcycles.

Brembo is just a company. It does not mean it is high tech. They can make cr@p just as easily as great stuff like the monobloc. I am generally not a fan of Brembos and feel they are one of the most overrated manufacturers out there. Their mystique comes from their ties to Porsches. Actually the Brembos on my BMW are cr@p, as most of my experience with them has been. I do admit the ones on my Hypermotard are very nice.

As for fuel injection, really the main reason why manufacturer use them is to meet EPA standards. In fairness to Harley, a large air cooled twin is much harder to meet these standards than with a liquid cooled inline four. This is probably the only reason, why HD went FI across the line before others.

I know we had this discussion before but the fact of the matter is, Harley engines are outdated old technology. There really is no way to deny this. Even Harley would admit that. That being said, all this is intentional and by design. They do this by choice. Not because they don't have the technology to do otherwise. Despite its limitation they stick with the 45 degree angle because they(and their customers) feel it is the most aesthetically pleasing to the eye. It is also tradition and what everyone identifies HD with. They stick with the huge pistons that rise up and down together instead of being offset because it produces that distinctive sound, vibration, and feel. They still use pushrods because those two tubes in front of the jugs look so cool. This is what their current customers want and that is what they give them. The relative sales failure of the VRod proves that.
A lot of the same could be said about your BMW and any other motorcycle, really... fuel injection specifically. Yes, Harley added it so as to keep the air cooled 45 degree V-Twin for a few more years, but they managed to do so without needing catalytic converters to meet the emissions regs. The 2010 Ural comes with catalytic converters, drum brakes out back and Mikuni carbs, how come there aren't hundreds of threads devoted to bashing them?

As for hydraulic valves and pushrods, they are still in use today on motors other than Harley's. Like the Yamaha Road Star, for example. Point being is that the valves do not require adjusting with this system and I'll take the pocketbook savings over the cost and hassle of a shim and bucket adjustment on a multi valved, multi cylindered motor any day.

As for Brembo, even you would have to admit it is a major improvement over the brakes that Harley used to have.

I understand your points and do in fact agree with most of them, however, when someone mouths off about how inferior the brand is, they usually do not have anyhere near the depth of knowledge and facts that you do. And most people seem to forget one very basic but important factor when talking about Harleys - they were never designed to be performance bikes and, with the exception of the V-Rod and Buell, never will be. What's the point of loading it up with all the latest gee-whiz technology if there's no reason to?
:canada: Mike :gummiente:
It isn't WHAT you ride,
It's THAT you ride
Top
User avatar
Gummiente
Site Supporter - Platinum
Site Supporter - Platinum
Posts: 3485
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 11:34 pm
Real Name: Mike
Sex: Male
Years Riding: 38
My Motorcycle: 03 Super Glide
Location: Kingston, ON

Re: Another motorcycle maufacturer goes down today.

  • Quote

#22 Post by Gummiente » Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:42 am

BRUMBEAR wrote:I don't want to be a troll
Too late. :laughing:
:canada: Mike :gummiente:
It isn't WHAT you ride,
It's THAT you ride
Top
User avatar
HYPERR
Site Supporter - Platinum
Site Supporter - Platinum
Posts: 3159
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 11:13 am
Sex: Male
My Motorcycle: Year/Make/Model
Location: CT, USA

Re: Another motorcycle maufacturer goes down today.

  • Quote

#23 Post by HYPERR » Sun Mar 07, 2010 5:12 am

Gummiente wrote: A lot of the same could be said about your BMW and any other motorcycle, really
Absolutely! BMW themselves thought the boxer was getting long in the tooth back in the 1980s. They wanted to kill it and replace with the newer Brick inlines. They even made the "Final Edition" boxers. Lo and behold, their customers totally disagreed! So much so that those original Bricks were the ones that got discontinued and the Boxer(it its latest incarnation) lives on.

Ducati still uses the crazy desmodromic system, along with the fragile timing belt that has to be replaced very frequently. All in the name of tradition. :roll:

Gummiente wrote: The 2010 Ural comes with catalytic converters, drum brakes out back and Mikuni carbs, how come there aren't hundreds of threads devoted to bashing them?
Well I can think of a few reasons. Most people don't even know what an Ural is. Urals are not exensive(in fact they are quite inexpensive). But the main reason probably is that Ural do not have that arrogant group of riders that think their bike is the only one worthy of riding, which seems to plague the Harley brand. Fortunately none of those idiots are member of this site.

Gummiente wrote: As for hydraulic valves and pushrods, they are still in use today on motors other than Harley's. Like the Yamaha Road Star, for example.
Yamaha put pushrods in their bike because they too thought those giant tubes in front of the Harley jugs look soooo cool! Another example of intentional regression of technology.

Gummiente wrote: As for Brembo, even you would have to admit it is a major improvement over the brakes that Harley used to have.
True.

Gummiente wrote: I understand your points and do in fact agree with most of them, however, when someone mouths off about how inferior the brand is, they usually do not have anyhere near the depth of knowledge and facts that you do. And most people seem to forget one very basic but important factor when talking about Harleys - they were never designed to be performance bikes and, with the exception of the V-Rod and Buell, never will be. What's the point of loading it up with all the latest gee-whiz technology if there's no reason to?
It's quite impressive what companies like HD and BMW have done to keep improving their iconic engines considering they have a very limited base to work with. BMW successfully made the move from air cooled to oil cooling. It will be intersting to see how Harley fares with their customers in their inevitable transition from air cooling to oil or liquid cooling in the not too distant future.
2008 Ducati Hypermotard 1100
2006 Kawasaki KLX250S
2004 Honda CBR600RR
2002 BMW R1150R
1996 Ducati 900SS
Top
jaskc78
Site Supporter - Platinum
Site Supporter - Platinum
Posts: 703
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 6:39 am
Sex: Male
Years Riding: 6
My Motorcycle: N/A
Location: Iola, KS

Re: Another motorcycle maufacturer goes down today.

  • Quote

#24 Post by jaskc78 » Sun Mar 07, 2010 6:20 am

There's already a kit you can buy to add an oil cooler to your Harley. I forget exactly how much it costs, but it's not terribly expensive and available at any dealership.
"Dude, women are like Vol-Tron. The more you can hook up the better it gets!" --RvB
Currently waiting on a new hip before I can get a new bike.
Top
User avatar
BRUMBEAR
Legendary 1000
Legendary 1000
Posts: 1227
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 3:27 am
Real Name: Dave
Sex: Male
Years Riding: 40
My Motorcycle: 2009 Buell 1125 CR
Location: in limbo

Re: Another motorcycle maufacturer goes down today.

  • Quote

#25 Post by BRUMBEAR » Sun Mar 07, 2010 11:53 am

Ich glaube Ich bien nicht align
http://dalefranks.com/cycles/index.php/ ... on-racing/
excuse the grammer :)
Herr Gummiente
there aint nothin like it
Top
User avatar
Gummiente
Site Supporter - Platinum
Site Supporter - Platinum
Posts: 3485
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 11:34 pm
Real Name: Mike
Sex: Male
Years Riding: 38
My Motorcycle: 03 Super Glide
Location: Kingston, ON

Re: Another motorcycle maufacturer goes down today.

  • Quote

#26 Post by Gummiente » Sun Mar 07, 2010 12:04 pm

HYPERR wrote:Urals are not exensive(in fact they are quite inexpensive).
Not so much anymore... a 2010 Gear-Up lists for $16,500 before taxes up here ($13,500 in the US). There are far better bikes - and cars - available in that price range.
:canada: Mike :gummiente:
It isn't WHAT you ride,
It's THAT you ride
Top
User avatar
HYPERR
Site Supporter - Platinum
Site Supporter - Platinum
Posts: 3159
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 11:13 am
Sex: Male
My Motorcycle: Year/Make/Model
Location: CT, USA

Re: Another motorcycle maufacturer goes down today.

  • Quote

#27 Post by HYPERR » Sun Mar 07, 2010 12:21 pm

Gummiente wrote:
HYPERR wrote:Urals are not exensive(in fact they are quite inexpensive).
Not so much anymore... a 2010 Gear-Up lists for $16,500 before taxes up here ($13,500 in the US). There are far better bikes - and cars - available in that price range.
$13,500 for a hack is still super cheap! :D
2008 Ducati Hypermotard 1100
2006 Kawasaki KLX250S
2004 Honda CBR600RR
2002 BMW R1150R
1996 Ducati 900SS
Top
User avatar
jstark47
Site Supporter - Silver
Site Supporter - Silver
Posts: 3538
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 2:58 pm
Sex: Male
Years Riding: 16
My Motorcycle: '12 Tiger 800, '03 Trophy 1200
Location: Lumberton, NJ

Re: Another motorcycle maufacturer goes down today.

  • Quote

#28 Post by jstark47 » Sun Mar 07, 2010 1:15 pm

BRUMBEAR wrote:Well H-D will stagger because they refuse to make affordable bikes that have better than 50 year old technology in most of its makeup but sadly I think they are to entrenched to fail.
BRUMBEAR wrote:But I digress where would we be without 45 degree, pushrod , primary drive to transmission, single disk front brake 700lb chrome cow with 58 hp at the crank for a mere $18,000 US. I have owned Harley's and still do but facts are facts they are not the most tech savy machines in the world for the money hell a 45 degree twin was built because it fit into a bicycle frame, and people are starting to notice.
Doood. A coupla points:
First, I'm as PO'd as anyone about what happened to Buell. Ultimately, I don't think closing Buell was in HD's long term best interest. But guess what? I'm not an HD executive or board member. They thought differently. Time will tell. In the meantime, Erik himself has moved on, and other people should get the hint and do likewise.

Second, if you're buying a Harley for performance, you're doing it wrong. You're missing the point. Harleys are about style, and if you like that kind of bike, they do it better than anyone else. As others have pointed out, they could easily adopt an engine with a more modern architecture. They don't by choice, they're building what their core customers want. If I was rich and had a whole stable of bikes, I'd have a Softail just for chugging around on, 'cause they look cool. But it's not a practical bike for distance riding, IMO. Gummi and I disagree on this point, and he rides his Roadglide all over the place. Admittedly, the touring frame got much better in '09, but for me a Harley is still a primarily a style exercise. And it's a gorgeous one at that.

Third, Harley isn't going anywhere. Their current financial troubles mostly stem from their financing division. Their management got a little behind the demographic curve and the oncoming recession, but guess what? Now they've got a new CEO. Their glory years probably ended about 2002, and they realize they're going to be a smaller company. They're downsizing their capabilities and costs accordingly, and they will end up at the right size for their current market.
2003 Triumph Trophy 1200
2009 BMW F650GS (wife's)
2012 Triumph Tiger 800
2018 Yamaha XT250 (wife's)
2013 Kawasaki KLX250S
Top
User avatar
jstark47
Site Supporter - Silver
Site Supporter - Silver
Posts: 3538
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 2:58 pm
Sex: Male
Years Riding: 16
My Motorcycle: '12 Tiger 800, '03 Trophy 1200
Location: Lumberton, NJ

Re: Another motorcycle maufacturer goes down today.

  • Quote

#29 Post by jstark47 » Sun Mar 07, 2010 1:22 pm

To the OP's point, Ridley wasn't a major manufacturer. And they hadn't been in production for over a year, there had only been a skeleton crew at the company. I don't think we're going to lose a major manufacturer, but we've already lost a couple of custom builders, IIRC. I would put Ridley more in that group.
Last edited by jstark47 on Sun Mar 07, 2010 2:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
2003 Triumph Trophy 1200
2009 BMW F650GS (wife's)
2012 Triumph Tiger 800
2018 Yamaha XT250 (wife's)
2013 Kawasaki KLX250S
Top
User avatar
BRUMBEAR
Legendary 1000
Legendary 1000
Posts: 1227
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 3:27 am
Real Name: Dave
Sex: Male
Years Riding: 40
My Motorcycle: 2009 Buell 1125 CR
Location: in limbo

Re: Another motorcycle maufacturer goes down today.

  • Quote

#30 Post by BRUMBEAR » Sun Mar 07, 2010 1:25 pm

See this pisses me off what did I say about Harley other than they are overpriced for the technology they have, They won't fail and I am sad about that.
So what point am I missing ?
Harley is Harley I am not that pissed about Buell trust me I got a 12K dollar motorcycle for 6K OTD I was pretty happy about the whole thing.
I think many of you are missing the point H-D pisses me off not because they can't make a good updated machine because they WON'T.
Attachments
Photo-0114.jpeg
there aint nothin like it
Top
Post Reply
  • Print view

83 posts
  • Page 3 of 9
    • Jump to page:
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • …
  • 9
  • Next

Return to “Total Motorcycle Talk”

Jump to
  • NEW: Please Login/Register to see ALL forums
  • Total Motorcycle Talk Forums
  • ↳   Start Your Engines - Introduce Yourself
  • ↳   Total Motorcycle Talk
  • News, Events and Stories
  • Total Motorcycle Garage Forums
  • Reviews
  • Rider Cafe'
  • Off Topic!
  • Total Motorcycle General
  • Board index
  • All times are UTC-11:00
  • Delete cookies
  • Contact us

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited

Privacy | Terms

 

 

TMW Privacy Policy - Forum Privacy Policy - Terms and Conditions

Follow us on X / Twitter - Facebook - YouTube - Pinterest - Instagram - News RSS Feed