Page 3 of 3
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:07 am
by iwannadie
Gummiente wrote:iwannadie wrote:type this stuff in a matter of seconds on a whime with no effort to proof read, spell check or even care if i make a mistake here or there
And it shows. Boy, does it show. But that's okay, I totally understand where you're coming from and Mexico would definitely be more your speed. Hasta la vista, baby.
good read regarding spelling and the internet.
http://ask.slashdot.org/askslashdot/05/ ... =215&tid=4
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 3:26 pm
by AmericanWeiner
Wow, I feel blessed that iwannadie's spelling is the worst that I've seen around here.
TMW really isn't that bad. Seriously. I've read forums that made my eyes bleed.
(No offense iwannadie. I understand that online grammar hardly ever relates to real life grammar.)
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 6:01 pm
by iwannadie
AmericanWeiner wrote:Wow, I feel blessed that iwannadie's spelling is the worst that I've seen around here.
TMW really isn't that bad. Seriously. I've read forums that made my eyes bleed.
(No offense iwannadie. I understand that online grammar hardly ever relates to real life grammar.)
no worries and i hear you, if people think im bad then they are very sheltered, check out the lowrider.com forum if you want to see what its really like out there.
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2005 7:43 pm
by Sev
iwannadie wrote:zootech wrote: By building this "bomb resistant" building, we're admitting that we fear being hit again.
guess cops shouldnt wear bullet proof vest, they are just admitting they are scared. people shouldnt wear seat belts thats an admission of fear. helmets, leathers any precaution is to admit fear.
i think we are better off taking every stet we can to save lives. its a new world and bomb threats are serious we cant just say it wont happen again and put people at risk.
Shouldn't use frame sliders either... that's like admitting you're going to crash.
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 7:22 am
by ZooTech
Sevulturus wrote:iwannadie wrote:zootech wrote: By building this "bomb resistant" building, we're admitting that we fear being hit again.
guess cops shouldnt wear bullet proof vest, they are just admitting they are scared. people shouldnt wear seat belts thats an admission of fear. helmets, leathers any precaution is to admit fear.
i think we are better off taking every stet we can to save lives. its a new world and bomb threats are serious we cant just say it wont happen again and put people at risk.
Shouldn't use frame sliders either... that's like admitting you're going to crash.
You guys totally miss the point (as usual for you, Sev). I'd just like to see them build a building the American people can be proud of. Instead, it looks as though they're going to build one that shows the whole world we're shaking in our boots.
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 1:07 pm
by Sev
Gosh, you're right, way to miss the joke. AGAIN.
I'm giving iwannadie a hard time because of his opinions on frame sliders. And at the same time actually supporting what you said, you're right, they should be rebuilt exactly like they were. Or better yet lets make them a little taller, or a little wider, something to show that Americans aren't scared. But you don't really care about what I say, you just want to be contentious. And you wouldn't let something annoying like... the logic or facts get in the way of that. As usual zoo.
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 2:39 pm
by Wizzard
In as far as what I think the new WTC should look like I agree with several of the comments previously made . I think it ought to look like this;

Kindest regards, Wizzard
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 3:10 pm
by ZooTech
Sevulturus wrote:Gosh, you're right, way to miss the joke. AGAIN.
I'm giving iwannadie a hard time because of his opinions on frame sliders. And at the same time actually supporting what you said, you're right, they should be rebuilt exactly like they were.
My bad, Dude...I totally took your post out of context. Sarcasm is sometimes hard to pick up in writing.
Wizzard wrote:In as far as what I think the new WTC should look like I agree with several of the comments previously made . I think it ought to look like this;

Kindest regards, Wizzard
Indeed.
