Re: 2011 Suzuki GSX-R600 - COOL WALL VOTE: In Progress
Posted: Wed May 25, 2011 10:35 am
I ride a Suzuki so maybe I'm biased but I think the GSXR line-up is an awesome family of bikes. That's all.
25 Years. 425 Million Readers. 54 years of Motorcycle Guides ∙ Reviews ∙ The friendliest motorcycle community on the internet!
https://www.totalmotorcycle.com/BBS/
You might want to look at the 750. I think it's only $400 more.spydercanopus wrote:
Currently I'm torn between buying a second bike (cruiser) and upgrading to a brand-new sports bike. Probably this one.
636 was a pioneer in that it was the first bike that competed in the 600 class but was not actually 600ccs.totalmotorcycle wrote:I saw a 2002 Kawasaki Ninja 636 last night parked, looked at it and thought, Suzuki GSX-600R was so much better than the 636. I felt a little sorry for the 636, although it still looks great after all these years.
Yes, I do know that (remember, I unfortunately have too much motorcycle knowledge in my head these days).HYPERR wrote:636 was a pioneer in that it was the first bike that competed in the 600 class but was not actually 600cc's.totalmotorcycle wrote:I saw a 2002 Kawasaki Ninja 636 last night parked, looked at it and thought, Suzuki GSX-600R was so much better than the 636. I felt a little sorry for the 636, although it still looks great after all these years.
That's why they made the 599cc ZX6RR as well so they can race in the 600 class. Ironically the 636 was the overall better bike than the more expensive ZX6RRWrider wrote:Yup on the 636. It was a "cheater" bike because it had more midrange than the others on the street. It however was not allowed to compete in the 600 class because... Well it wasn't under 600 ccs!
From what I've heard that's the complete truth right there. Smaller engine, no pillion seat, and from what I hear a lot of "small production run" troubles on the 6RR.HYPERR wrote:That's why they made the 599cc ZX6RR as well so they can race in the 600 class. Ironically the 636 was the overall better bike than the more expensive ZX6RRWrider wrote:Yup on the 636. It was a "cheater" bike because it had more midrange than the others on the street. It however was not allowed to compete in the 600 class because... Well it wasn't under 600 ccs!
To add insult to injury, if you wanted the Lime Green that first year, you had to get the RR.Wrider wrote:From what I've heard that's the complete truth right there. Smaller engine, no pillion seat, and from what I hear a lot of "small production run" troubles on the 6RR.HYPERR wrote:That's why they made the 599cc ZX6RR as well so they can race in the 600 class. Ironically the 636 was the overall better bike than the more expensive ZX6RRWrider wrote:Yup on the 636. It was a "cheater" bike because it had more midrange than the others on the street. It however was not allowed to compete in the 600 class because... Well it wasn't under 600 ccs!