Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2006 4:25 pm
I ride a 250 so based in myself and my bike i would have to agree with those saying that it is inversely related.
25 Years. 425 Million Readers. 54 years of Motorcycle Guides ∙ Reviews ∙ The friendliest motorcycle community on the internet!
https://www.totalmotorcycle.com/BBS/
Care to explain how you happened upon that listing, LL?Lion_Lady wrote:and for anyone who wishes to 'make up' the difference, here's just the thing on ebay: http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayI ... :B:EF:US:1
P
Oh. That's even worse.Lion_Lady wrote:Hubby found it
Mintbread wrote:So on the flip side do women that own large motorcycles merely wish to convey the fact that they have large vaginas?
"Hey boys, look what I can fit between my legs!"
No, my guess is that it shows just how much they don't need a man...Mintbread wrote:So on the flip side do women that own large motorcycles merely wish to convey the fact that they have large vaginas?
"Hey boys, look what I can fit between my legs!"
Duh, like why do you think washing machine manufacturers never fix the vibration problem.Mintbread wrote:I thought that was why they liked riding horses so much, not motorcycles.
Edit: Oh, I get you. Took me a moment but I got there.
Wow, I gotta check the New Riders forum more often......Sevulturus wrote:Hmmm, BuzZz and Sev two small guys with average size... bikes. Must make the... bikes... look HUGE!
And it's not "directly related." It's inversely proportional.