180 MPG

Message

camthepyro · #31 Post by **camthepyro** » Tue Apr 25, 2006 2:26 pm

paul246
PostPosted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 5:58 pm Post subject: I don't need no stinkin hybrid
40 years ahead of its time. Gets 175mpg and its still working like a charm.
1965 Honda C200 Tourer.

I want one of those, more as a novelty then anything else. Maybe just to run up to grab a bite to eat and watch everone stare.

CNF2002 · #32 Post by **CNF2002** » Tue Apr 25, 2006 2:43 pm

flynrider wrote:
CNF2002 wrote:Right, they made 36 billion dollars last year, but you'll show them who's boss by giving them $20 less a month
If everyone gives them $20 less a month, those profits will shrink pretty dramatically.

Yeah but where will soccer moms drink their Starbucks if not in their SUV.

camthepyro · #33 Post by **camthepyro** » Tue Apr 25, 2006 2:46 pm

Seriously. Why does no one yell at starbucks for charging 4 bucks for a cup of coffee?

jmillheiser · #34 Post by **jmillheiser** » Tue Apr 25, 2006 3:14 pm

if they can keep that price point and improve the styling a bit I would be game for one of those hybrid bikes. Performance is on a par with a 400cc machine and better than most 250s (aside from the limited top speed).

skoebl · #35 Post by **skoebl** » Tue Apr 25, 2006 3:45 pm

camthepyro wrote:Seriously. Why does no one yell at starbucks for charging 4 bucks for a cup of coffee?

For the same reason Ben and Jerry's charges so much for their ice cream. They are both a couple of the best companies at which to work in the US. They take care of their employees with good benefits and all that rigamarole. As soon as my local Vons is remodeled (in a month), I'm going to be the manager at the new Starbucks...which will be 100000x better than working for Vons...I hate that poo-hole....

Err....yess.....hybrid motorcycle....

earwig · #36 Post by **earwig** » Tue Apr 25, 2006 4:26 pm

What is "vons"?

skoebl wrote:
camthepyro wrote:Seriously. Why does no one yell at starbucks for charging 4 bucks for a cup of coffee?
For the same reason Ben and Jerry's charges so much for their ice cream. They are both a couple of the best companies at which to work in the US. They take care of their employees with good benefits and all that rigamarole. As soon as my local Vons is remodeled (in a month), I'm going to be the manager at the new Starbucks...which will be 100000x better than working for Vons...I hate that poo-hole....

Err....yess.....hybrid motorcycle....

#37 Post by **Jamers!** » Tue Apr 25, 2006 4:35 pm

earwig wrote:What is "vons"?

skoebl wrote:
camthepyro wrote:Seriously. Why does no one yell at starbucks for charging 4 bucks for a cup of coffee?
For the same reason Ben and Jerry's charges so much for their ice cream. They are both a couple of the best companies at which to work in the US. They take care of their employees with good benefits and all that rigamarole. As soon as my local Vons is remodeled (in a month), I'm going to be the manager at the new Starbucks...which will be 100000x better than working for Vons...I hate that poo-hole....

Err....yess.....hybrid motorcycle....

vons is a supermarket chain on the west coast

JWF

skoebl · #38 Post by **skoebl** » Tue Apr 25, 2006 4:55 pm

Vons is a division of Safeway Inc. It is only (I think) in Southern California. Safeway, Genuardis, Tom Thumb, Pavillions, Vons; they are all the same lame "O Ring" company

earwig · #39 Post by **earwig** » Tue Apr 25, 2006 6:27 pm

ah ok thanks.

Scott58 · #40 Post by **Scott58** » Tue Apr 25, 2006 6:37 pm

I haven't owned a vehicle that has gotten less then 40mpg since 1995 (93 toyota tercel) And I won't buy any thing that gets less then that. My 48cc spitfire gets an average 169mpg and will do 35mph and is great for just buzzing around town. I use my Rebel (80mpg) back and forth to work and traveling solo. My S50 (50 to 55mpg) for mostly 2-up riding (some solo joy rides). I just ordered an electric hub motor for a bicycle thats suppose to do 30mph with a 20 mile range. I'd certainly get a hybrid bike if the price was right, but i agree with what has already been pointed out, cost for cost a normally aspirated vehicle is more cost effective.