Page 4 of 7
Re: A good point...
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:28 pm
by Gummiente
jaskc78 wrote:what do you guys think?
Buy the one that best fits in the back of your truck?

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:32 pm
by jaskc78
well played, Gummiente, well played indeed.
i've actually been very fortunate that both of the bikes i have so far have fit in the back of my truck. took quite a bit of moving it inches at a time forward and back to get it at the angle i wanted, but they both fit. the toolbox/fuel tank in the back cuts the bed size down a good bit.
Where fools rush in...
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 3:45 pm
by Ryethil
jaskc78 wrote:
in spite of my desire to not take this thread further off course, i disagree with your statements and am compelled to reply.
Snip
call me a cager if you want, that's fine. call me a redneck, i'm proud of my heritage. call me a back-woods country bumpkin farmboy and it don't bother me none. but you touch my truck in anger and we will come to an understanding.
now, i don't expect everyone to understand that or agree with it, but you can't deny the fact that you don't need to be on a motorcycle to love what you drive or ride. i feel just as free in my truck as i'm sure any of you do on a motorcycle. this being a motorcycle forum, though, i prefer to talk motorcycles here. i apologize for the lengthy post about my truck.
snip
what do you guys think?
Your reply started to make me angry. That I wasn't good enough to be here. But I am and I plan on staying.
So what is your problem with me? I'm not laughing. I'm not calling you a redneck. (We have one thing in common.) I'm not what my mother hoped for in a daughter but I'm not a monster either. So what twisted your crank?
I have a truck too (my cage). I rebuilt a really rusty 1967 Chevy long wheelbase pickup and I take a lot of pride in it too. It is used more by my brothers and family than I drive it but it's still MY truck.
I only tried to help. I feel I should of handled it better but I'm unsure how. I found this forum this weekend and I like it a lot. So I'm going to be here. But I don't want to feel that I am in some way causing you grief. So lets find a place where we can mutually disagree and let all of this go.
Okay!?!
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 4:50 pm
by jaskc78
i don't have a problem with you, nor do i think you're not good enough to be here. it also wasn't my intent to make you, or anyone else on this forum, angry.
my post was just me stating that you don't have to ride a motorcycle to feel a bond that goes beyond driver and mechanical transportation contraption. i'm sorry that i wasn't more specific in my post, i didn't mean to direct it at you at all. it was a "you" in the general John Q. Public sense, not a "you" in the you-the-person-i'm-talking-to-right-now sense.
i tend to picture myself in situations in order to get my thoughts together and it has a tendency to cause a bit of intensity from time to time...or so i'm told.
again, i'm sorry. didn't mean to direct anything at you or make you feel unwelcome here.
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 5:19 pm
by drevil
How about a Yammi Warrior?
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 6:50 pm
by jaskc78
i looked at those, DrEvil, and as much as i like the black and the rear fender i just couldn't buy into it. i actually looked at a lot of the sport cruisers because that's what i figured i would have liked, but i dunno.
and what's really weird is that i woulda definitely pegged me for the guy that would go after the fastest bike or the biggest engine or something that could be considered extreme in one way or another, but i just don't feel drawn to them.
i'm really starting to feel like i'm checking out personal ads with how much time i've been spending looking at dealer galleries on motorcycle pages. i am starting to consider buying one bike just for in-town and another bike for longer rides. maybe the Royal Enfield G5 Military for commuting and one of the other four for the rides out to grandma's or something.

tell me that wouldn't be the most awesome bike in the world to ride to work on a military base. and for just $6100, it really wouldn't be that big of a stretch to just buy that one outright and do some financing on the other.
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:22 pm
by Gummiente
jaskc78 wrote:tell me that wouldn't be the most awesome bike in the world to ride to work on a military base.
No, THIS would be the most awesome bike in the world to ride to work on a military base...

We're understaffed...
Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:37 am
by Ryethil
So I'm at work already.
Gummiente wrote:jaskc78 wrote:tell me that wouldn't be the most awesome bike in the world to ride to work on a military base.
No, THIS would be the most awesome bike in the world to ride to work on a military base...

Ah, em, guys, aren't you both going a bit retro here.
I've rode one of the new Royal Enfields without any expectations and
I fell for it hard. Yes, it wouldn't work that well for a primary bike but it sure would be wonderful for slipping through traffic. Of course that was AFTER I praised a guy for how beautiful his "OLD" Endfield was and how much I admired the a restoration job he had done. The SOB just let me go on and on, never telling me it was just out of the showroom .
Jaskc78, I can't live with just one bike. But I'm a bit strange that way.
Mike, what I don't understand is why the fasination with Urals. They are basically somethng my grandfather would have driven. They're good bikes thouugh I don't know how reliable they are because aren't they Russian? Also, isn't that bike a flat twin? Didn't know theey came in that flavor?
As for neat bikes for riding on military bases my friend has an original Harley 45 with a sidecar. He even drives it around to the shocked looks of the "norm". I would lovve to have a a military German R65 with a side car, I don't what I would actually do with it but it would sure be extreme.
Of course, right now I'm restoring an Austin Healey 3000 mkIII so I can't talk about (whispered) retro
Question: What photo sight should I use to upload photos to? I have bunch of pictures of his courier bike but I can't upload them from my computer.

Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 1:53 am
by jaskc78
i have a photobucket account that i use.
Re: We're understaffed...
Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 2:56 am
by HYPERR
Ryethil wrote:
Mike, what I don't understand is why the fasination with Urals.
That is what I was trying to point out in the Honda post. Everyone is different and different types of bike move different souls.
Whether intentional or unintentional, your extreme bias against Honda is prevalent in your post. That's fine. That is your opinion. However to state that one cannot bond with any brand other than the ones you stated is just plain wrong.