Page 5 of 5
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 5:54 am
by rapidblue
MakeCarsStandSTill wrote:Thanks Verm < your the only one i guess who reads, OR knows anything
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
funniest thing I've read all day.
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 6:15 am
by MakeCarsStandSTill
m sorry TO EVERYONE ON THE FORUM I WAS HAVING A BAD DAY< AND WAT I dont even remember who said it, just made me write that, I apologize and only hope you guys can forgive me
But i still stand by that im better!!

jk........
Im not here to make enemies, so im apoligizing!!
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 8:48 am
by flynrider
So, is your bike currently redlining at 189 mph, and if so, what gear?
BTW - You'll have to excuse the group. We're not used to someone with such vast experience asking such basic questions.

Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 10:32 am
by MakeCarsStandSTill
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 8:20 am
by macktruckturner
One should note that what your speedometer says (over about 30mph) and what your actual speed is are often two entirely different things. Motorcycles are extremely lacking the aerodynamics world - which is why breaking 200mph takes such stupid power on such light vehicles. Drag is the most serious issue at hand, and as it can not be realistically reduced to the point of mattering much - one must turn to a combination of gearing and power.
Having actually driven a vehicle at a true (laser verified) 192mph, I can assure you that life above a true 160mph is insane - and as the needle (or LCD) rises higher, so too does the insanity at an exponential rate. You eat up some serious pavement at 192, and need to be ready to stop/turn yesterday.
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 4:15 pm
by Nalian
I can't even conceive of traveling at 192 mph on land. I try to reconcile the fact that everytime you blink you're 281 feet further than you were before and my mind boggles.
Sorry to interrupt, carry-on!