Page 5 of 18

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 4:58 am
by Nalian
The Crimson Rider® wrote:
CNF2002 wrote:
The Crimson Rider® wrote:racing is competing w/ somebody else.

i never competed w/ somebody else in the canyons.
No, racing is going fast for the sake of it. I can race without racing against anyone.
err no...

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/racing


there has to be a competition.
Haha - you didn't even read your own damn link. There are many more definitions for race and racing than a competition of speed. It is perfectly acceptable use of the word to say that someone who is traveling quickly is "racing around" - and that is what you describe yourself doing often.

Anyone going double the limit on public roads, and passing over double solid yellows deserves to get busted for it. If you don't see the problem with it, congratulations, you're blind.

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 4:59 am
by jonnythan
Nalian wrote:
The Crimson Rider® wrote:err no...

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/racing


there has to be a competition.
Haha - you didn't even read your own damn link. There are many more definitions for race and racing than a competition of speed. It is perfectly acceptable use of the word to say that someone who is traveling quickly is "racing around" - and that is what you describe yourself doing often.

Anyone going double the limit on public roads, and passing over double solid yellows deserves to get busted for it. If you don't see the problem with it, congratulations, you're blind.
Indeed. Definition #3 for the intransitive verb "race" is "to run, move, or go swiftly." Definition #3 for the transitive verb "race" is "to cause to run, move, or go at high speed"

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 5:01 am
by VermilionX
Lion_Lady wrote:
Get real. There are idiot bikers out there.

P
i know. and yes, in your experience, that is wrong of them to do.



when i encounter a slower vehicle... i don't pass them immediately.

i tail them for awhile, see if they'll let me pass. if not, then i pick my spot to pass.

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 5:06 am
by CNF2002
Well I've said my peace in this thread. You just can't talk reason into someone who only thinks of themselves.

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 5:24 am
by NorthernPete
oh, I had watched the whole thing before I posted, I had just started typing before I finished...Im tired...stupid night shift...

I still think this is a very anti motorcycle story. they say "small percentage" but then proceed to tell the horror stories and show the mangled bikes and what not. They dont spend much time on the ones who dont speed.

this will occur in any area that is a big bike draw. I would hate to see the stats on Deals Gap. like I said, how many of the crashes they talked about are speed related and how many are cages merging into you ect.

Im shocked fox news would do a story like this :roll:

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 5:27 am
by jonnythan
NorthernPete wrote:oh, I had watched the whole thing before I posted, I had just started typing before I finished...Im tired...stupid night shift...

I still think this is a very anti motorcycle story. they say "small percentage" but then proceed to tell the horror stories and show the mangled bikes and what not. They dont spend much time on the ones who dont speed.
I thought they did. The repeated the point and even made one of the more prominent interviewees a guy who has been biking for 50+ years.

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 5:38 am
by NorthernPete
Need built in speed limiters on bikes then?

seems to em that would solve the problem....

How long til someone started screaming about their rights being infringed upon I wonder....

I personally dont see the point of having a bike that will go over 130 MPH on the street, its illeagle to go that fast on a public road. keep them at the track for the track. remove the limiter when you enter the place, put it back on when ya leave. problem solved?

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 5:51 am
by CajunBass
NorthernPete wrote: I still think this is a very anti motorcycle story. they say "small percentage" but then proceed to tell the horror stories and show the mangled bikes and what not. They dont spend much time on the ones who dont speed.
Frankly, the story is about those who DO speed and crash. The ones who don't aren't news. Thousands of cars and semis drive down I-95 every day. The ones that crash get on the 6 O'clock news.

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:35 am
by ZooTech
Lion_Lady wrote:What SHOULD be done? What CAN be done?
Lion_Lady wrote:"How do we catch them without putting more people at risk?"
Posing questions, but offering no answers, Pam? Are you trying to come across as the insightful professor eliciting thought in her students, or just drawing attention to yourself and your expert grasp of motorcycling despite your "disability" (i.e. being a woman) as usual?

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:39 am
by Wrider
Well, after viewing that clip, I know a couple of methods that can be used, but not safely for everyone else that rides that road. I do however vote for some cops sitting on the faster corners, with radar guns, and one or two guys with a flatbed at the other end, picking up the ones doing grossly over the limit, such as 20+ over the PSL, and giving out tickets to the others. Before I get flamed for the tickets to everyone, let me say that yeah, I guarantee I'd get a ticket for going 5-10 over, but in no way shape or form would I EVER pass someone on a blind corner going that fast, I'm just not stupid/suicidal...
Wrider