Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 2:34 am
To clarify:
By 'colonial' I mean, of course, 'American' and probably also 'Australian' (Though the temptation to disown the Aussies is very great. Aussies are a total embarassment to all civilised standards of behaviour.) Canadians and Kiwis seem to have achieved a more mature culture (one closer to ours) - and have a more equable temperament than their excitable neighbours.
As far as the yanks go, that's probably down to the French influence again! Tell me wrider, how do you explain your use of the word 'apartment' (Fr. apartement) instead of 'flat', or 'vacation' (Fr. vacances) instead of 'holiday' and all the other suspiciously Gallic usages that occur within your quaint American dialect.
By 'yanks' I mean, of course, Americans. Only you colonials have ever troubled yourselves over the entirely trivial matter of your sub-cultural divisions. (We will not, of course, mention the Scots, here - a barbaric race with little hope of recovery.)

P.S. I mention these matters entirely for your own good.
By 'colonial' I mean, of course, 'American' and probably also 'Australian' (Though the temptation to disown the Aussies is very great. Aussies are a total embarassment to all civilised standards of behaviour.) Canadians and Kiwis seem to have achieved a more mature culture (one closer to ours) - and have a more equable temperament than their excitable neighbours.
As far as the yanks go, that's probably down to the French influence again! Tell me wrider, how do you explain your use of the word 'apartment' (Fr. apartement) instead of 'flat', or 'vacation' (Fr. vacances) instead of 'holiday' and all the other suspiciously Gallic usages that occur within your quaint American dialect.
By 'yanks' I mean, of course, Americans. Only you colonials have ever troubled yourselves over the entirely trivial matter of your sub-cultural divisions. (We will not, of course, mention the Scots, here - a barbaric race with little hope of recovery.)

P.S. I mention these matters entirely for your own good.