Marx wrote:I don't follow the logic behind those who make statments about 'security' in their 'maleness'. It's odd, do women go around (or rather, do men try shaming women into saying) about being 'secure in their feminity'? No.
It often comes across to me that guys and women who use such language are effectively trying to imply that people who do not follow their line of though must be 'insecure'. Why is a person 'insecure' just because they do not like something, or, shock - horror, don't think the same way as you?
This is foolish. We are all insecure - very - all of the time! It is just a matter of degree and how easily we are prepared to admit it. Insecurity is a reality in a world where nobody can can predict anything with certainty - ever. We might get cancer tomorrow. Or we might drop our bikes in front of our friends who will laugh to try and make us feel insecure as a way of covering up their own insecurity.
All men are insecure in their 'manhood'. Manhood is not something natural; it is an image that society constructs for us and tells us that we have to live up to. And it is a hard call because part of the image demands that we pretend we are not insecure. Big double bind.
You see the telltale signs of crumbling male egos everywhere, particularly in those who have bought into the image wholesale. Women are just as insecure as we are, but on the whole that is not so much a problem for them. Society does not demand they hide it so thoroughly.
It's simple: People get stressed, not because they are insecure - that's universal - but because they go round trying to pretend that they're not. And the fact is, they fail abysmally.
So Marx. My advice would be, forget other people's name calling. Just accept you feel insecure and realise that everyone else feels the same way as you do.
I charge $60 an hour. I'll send you my bill. My secretary will give you a prescription on the way out.
