pigsbladder wrote:I gotta disagree jstark. In my experience it's completely opposite. North Eastern England where I used to live sure there were places you could ride and a few back roads, but for the most part it's congested. The sheer space where I live now in the US is just insane. Just 10/15 minutes from the house, we can turn up a road and not encounter another car for the entire section of road. I'm sure NJ is very different from AR however.
Hi pb
In my experience, the north-east of England is pretty congested, and is therefore not unlike many other parts of the UK, though it isn't typical of the country as a whole and is very different from the south.
Putting this in context, the population density of the US is 31 per square km, while the population density of the UK is 243 per square km - eight times greater (according to my ever-trusty Financial Times World Desk Reference). There is no avoiding that fact.
What I'm getting from your post, though, pb, is that general figures like that can be misleading. Clearly the population density in the US varies very much from area to area, from region to region. And the same is true of the UK. There are some parts, up in Scotland for instance, where the population density is very low indeed and the roads (outside the tourist season) are a joy to ride. Even in my own part of the country, I know a huge number of roads where I can bimble along and see very few other vehicles.
The skill in the UK is knowing which roads to ride - and the island is small enough that you don't have to travel far to find them.
(OK Mr Stark - I AM still trying to finish off the Scotland blog bit by bit.)