Page 1 of 1
GS500 or EX500?
Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 5:54 pm
by < I Fly >
It's a moot point for me since I already have the EX-500, but I am interested to know which bike is generally considered better or at least more powerful/faster.
I see very few reviews of the GS but a couple more of the EX.
I gotta say as far as bang for the buck goes, it would be hard to beat my Ninja as it cremates just about anything on four wheels but gets great mileage and didn't cost me a whole lot, and because it's so inexpensive you can toss it around with impunity.
Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 5:55 pm
by Jamers!
gs500f or e?
JWF
Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 5:58 pm
by < I Fly >
FFFFFF
yaa
Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 9:24 pm
by Dirtytoes
i'd say EX but thats only because i love my bike..
P.S. i don't know jack about the GS
Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:10 am
by DivideOverflow
the ninja is a bit faster.
Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 6:30 am
by Loonette
This was initially posted by mistake in a different topic. I'm not able to move "posts" - only entire threads. So I've pasted his response here...
********************************************************
JWF505
Site Supporter - Gold
Site Supporter - Gold
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
Posts: 960
Location: Los Angles
PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 6:21 am Post subject: Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
GS500F:
ngine: 487cc, four-stroke, twin cylinder, air-cooled, DOHC
Bore Stroke: 74.0 x 56.6mm
Compression Ratio: 9.0:1
Fuel System: Mikuni BSR34SS
Lubrication: Wet Sump
Ignition: Digital/Transistorized
Transmission: 6-speed
Final Drive: #520 chain
Overall Length: 2080mm (81.9 in.)
Overall Width: 800mm (31.5 in.)
Overall Height: 1150mm (45.3 in.)
Seat Height: 790mm (31.1 in.)
Ground Clearance: 120mm (4.7 in.)
Wheelbase: 1405mm (55.3 in.)
Dry Weight: 180kg (396.8 lbs.)
Suspension Front: Telescopic, oil damped
Suspension Rear: Link type, 5-way adjustable preload
Brakes Front: Single hydraulic disc
Brakes Rear: Single hydraulic disc
Tires Front: 110/70-17
Tires Rear: 130/70-17
Fuel Tank Capacity: 20.0 liter (5.3 gal.) 19.0 liter (5.0 gal.) CA. Model
Color: Blue/White, Silver/Black
EX500:
Engine: Four-stroke, DOHC, parallel twin
Displacement: 498cc
Starting: Electric
Bore x stroke: 74.0 x 58.0mm
Compression ratio: 10.8:1
Cooling: Liquid
Carburetion: Keihin CVK34 x 2
Ignition: TCBI with digital advance
Transmission: Six-speed
Final drive: Chain
Frame: High-tensile steel, perimeter design
Rake / trail: 27 degrees / 3.6 in.
Front suspension / wheel travel: 37mm hydraulic telescopic fork / 5.1 in.
Rear suspension / wheel travel: UNI-TRAK® system with single shock / 3.9 in.
Front tire: 11/70x17 tubeless
Rear tire: 130/70x17 tubeless
Front brake / rear brake: Hydraulic disc / Disc
Overall length: 82.5 in.
Overall width: 27.6 in.
Overall height: 45.7 in.
Ground clearance: 4.7 in.
Seat height: 30.5 in.
Dry weight: 388 lbs.
Fuel capacity: 4.8 gal.
Wheelbase: 56.5 in.
Color: Metallic Titanium or Solar Yellow
MSRP: $5,049
as for which handles better and that kinda stuff, hopefully people with a GS and an EX will give ya some insight there.
JWF
_________________
Not dead, dont quit
There are only 10 types of people out there, people who understand binary and those who dont.
Sevulturus wrote:
What's a bike?
JWF505 wrote:
its like a goat, but with two wheels.
JWF
Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 12:36 pm
by 1will
2004 Suzuki GS500F vs. 2004 Kawasaki Ninja 500
http://www.mcnews.com/mcn/model_eval/Ni ... aro07a.pdf
from Motorcycle News, July 2004
edit: i forgot the

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 12:50 pm
by Sev
Summary, the only thing the Suzuki has over the Kawasaki is styling. And even that is subjective.
Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 1:32 pm
by fireguzzi
The ex500 may out perform the gs, but that definatly doesn't mean you should count out the gs if you are looking for a first or even second bike.
With an upgrade to progressive springs, the gs would probably out handle the ex. I believe yo can even fit a katana 600 rear shock on one. (i think)
I have yet to scrape a peg, but I have come damn close without any stability issues. And thats on stock suspension.
The power, as we all know, will easily outpull most any car on the road without a problem. I don't know how it compares to the ex becuase I never rode one. But I have picked the front wheel up a few times under some spirited accelaration.
As far as looks go, I think the ex500 is a tad fugly. But then again I don't like the gs500f either. I prefer the gs500e.
Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 5:44 pm
by < I Fly >
After reading that article I'm pretty damn happy with my choice of ride.
I'll probably keep this thing through the whole summer.