Page 1 of 3
World Trade Center
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 2:09 am
by Big B
saw it last night, just, wow. that's all that came out of my mouth for the ride home last night. incredible movie, all the political b.s. is left out of it, and they focus on the two families. i highly recommend it.
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 2:31 am
by Nibblet99
They turned an act of terrorism like that into a movie?
Thats just plane wrong
***EDIT***
So are the proceeds from piggy backing on an international tragedy at least going to charity, rather than making a movie company rich?
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 2:41 am
by Z (fka Sweet Tooth)
I don't think I'm ready to watch that just yet. I'll probably wait till it's out on rental and watch it in the privacy of my home.
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 3:42 am
by GrandGT
i love all the "oh we made this movie to show the heroes" and the "theres no politics whatsoever" but it looks like there will be plenty of profits. "Donut Holes". if i hear the movies profits go to charity ill change my mind instantly.
this reminds me of the whole catholic church molestation thing, where the lawyers for the people were like 'this is a great day that we can finally have closure for the victims' when they heard they were getting a shitton of money. of course the lawyers failed to mention theyd be pocketing a something like a cool 30 mil out of it.
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 4:03 am
by GrandGT
i decided to look it up and theyre donating 10% of the first 5 days. thats like a publicity stunt more than charity work
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 4:08 am
by jonnythan
What's wrong with making a movie about it that glorifies the heroes on the ground that day...?
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 4:29 am
by GrandGT
absolutely nothing, but if the reason (or mostly the reason, or half the reason) people go to see the movie is to learn about the heroes, shouldnt the heroes (or charities associated with) be the ones who gain from it? This isnt a historical event, its a modern event, and the studio is just cashing in on others misfortune. If this were really an educational/emotional film it would be something you could go see at a 911 museum/memorial with the proceeds going to said establishment.
i would love to go see this movie, but im not going to line oliver stone or nicolas cage's pockets.
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 4:49 am
by sharpmagna
i don't need to see this movie, i know how it ends already.
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 4:52 am
by jonnythan
GrandGT wrote:absolutely nothing, but if the reason (or mostly the reason, or half the reason) people go to see the movie is to learn about the heroes, shouldnt the heroes (or charities associated with) be the ones who gain from it? This isnt a historical event, its a modern event, and the studio is just cashing in on others misfortune. If this were really an educational/emotional film it would be something you could go see at a 911 museum/memorial with the proceeds going to said establishment.
i would love to go see this movie, but im not going to line oliver stone or nicolas cage's pockets.
It's just a movie. It's entertainment.
Regular people pay to go to the movies and see an entertaining film.
Get over it.
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 4:57 am
by Nalian
I fail to see how watching a movie about 9/11 will be entertaining. Moving/emotional/etc - but just the fact that someone would classify it as entertaining is reason enough for me that it shouldn't have been done like that.