Could this motorcycle be stolen? I need advice.
Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 8:25 am
I am planning on getting my first motorcycle.
Yesterday I looked at a 2001 Yamaha R6. The motorcycle has 16000 miles on it.
I has been dropped atleast couple of times as both sides are scratched. It has sliders so the damage is not too bad. It doesnt have mirrors and turn signals, but it's not too expensive to get new ones.
What really puzzles me is the title. The guy says he is the second owner of the bike. The bike was originally purchased in Minnesota, and I am located in St. Louis Missouri. It still has Minnesota plates on it. What also really puzzles me is that the title is not in his name. It is in the first owners name but it has been signed in the back as if it was sold.
The guy said that his information is not filled out because that is what most people do when they buy motorcycles. They dont fill out the information of the seller on the title that way you can fill it out yourself and you wont have to pay as much tax on it because you can put down lower selling price on it.
This seems a little shady to me, but could this be true? I really need some advice!
Thank you!
Yesterday I looked at a 2001 Yamaha R6. The motorcycle has 16000 miles on it.
I has been dropped atleast couple of times as both sides are scratched. It has sliders so the damage is not too bad. It doesnt have mirrors and turn signals, but it's not too expensive to get new ones.
What really puzzles me is the title. The guy says he is the second owner of the bike. The bike was originally purchased in Minnesota, and I am located in St. Louis Missouri. It still has Minnesota plates on it. What also really puzzles me is that the title is not in his name. It is in the first owners name but it has been signed in the back as if it was sold.
The guy said that his information is not filled out because that is what most people do when they buy motorcycles. They dont fill out the information of the seller on the title that way you can fill it out yourself and you wont have to pay as much tax on it because you can put down lower selling price on it.
This seems a little shady to me, but could this be true? I really need some advice!
Thank you!