Total Motorcycle Community Forums

Hi guys,
Thanks for all of your help and support. Now that I've taken a deep breath and calmed down (I want a different bike Baaaad), I have taken the advice of (SharpMagna? Super Magna?) and read the article suggested under the topic "Another Rookie needs 'Lots of Help".
Anywho, I am going to look at a 2001 Ninja ZX600 with approximately 10000 miles on it. What do you think about going from my super 1991 Honda CB250 Nighthawk to a Ninja 6. I really respect your opinions.

OK, lets add a 2000 ZR7 and a 2002 SV650S to the mix. What do you think?

I think it's upgrade time I have mixed thoughts about all of those bikes. Be careful and get a feel for the new bike.. post pics when you get it too

the ZR-7 is a standard bike so it doesn't really fit in the comparison.

but i like the '01 ZX-6R compare to an '02 SV650S.

The ZR7 is another bike that was overlooked. Not great an anything but competent at a lot of stuff. Fun bike for twisties but won't compete with the hard core sportbikes. Makes a decent commuter. Light touring-no problem. I think Kaw even had hard bags for this bike but I may be wrong on that.

In short, a decent bike that you can put a lot of miles on. We almost bought one for my wife.

The SV and Kaw have been discussed enough on here so I won't get into them. Both decent bikes.

The Crimson Rider® wrote:the ZR-7 is a standard bike so it doesn't really fit in the comparison.

but i like the '01 ZX-6R compare to an '02 SV650S.

Where do you get this stuff? If it's one of the bikes he's considering, it fits by definition. There are enough differences between the ZX-6 and the SV to say that they wouldn't "fit" into a comparison.

The ZR-7 and the SV probably have more in common with each other than they do with the ZX-6. Have you ever ridden any of these bikes?

flynrider wrote:

The Crimson Rider® wrote:the ZR-7 is a standard bike so it doesn't really fit in the comparison.

but i like the '01 ZX-6R compare to an '02 SV650S.

Where do you get this stuff? If it's one of the bikes he's considering, it fits by definition. There are enough differences between the ZX-6 and the SV to say that they wouldn't "fit" into a comparison.

The ZR-7 and the SV probably have more in common with each other than they do with the ZX-6. Have you ever ridden any of these bikes?

Try not to question Verm's line of thinking.

flynrider wrote:
Where do you get this stuff? If it's one of the bikes he's considering, it fits by definition. There are enough differences between the ZX-6 and the SV to say that they wouldn't "fit" into a comparison.

The ZR-7 and the SV probably have more in common with each other than they do with the ZX-6. Have you ever ridden any of these bikes?

both the ZX-6R and the SV650S are sportbikes.

the ZR7 is a standard bike.

The Crimson Rider® wrote:

flynrider wrote:
Where do you get this stuff? If it's one of the bikes he's considering, it fits by definition. There are enough differences between the ZX-6 and the SV to say that they wouldn't "fit" into a comparison.

The ZR-7 and the SV probably have more in common with each other than they do with the ZX-6. Have you ever ridden any of these bikes?

both the ZX-6R and the SV650S are sportbikes.

the ZR7 is a standard bike.

The more you think you know... the less you actually do.

[looks up the specs]

ZR7 appears to be the defunct competitor of Katana 750. 4 cylinders, air cooled, very heavy, not very powerful, and only 5 speed transmission. Doesn't look like a good choice.