The "harley lifestyle" is misleading
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:17 pm
As I was driving to work today in my Escalade (with a harley pride sticker on the back) I thought of the whole Harley lifestyle thing. Here is my short opinion on the whole Harley bit. I don't care that much either way if it turns into one of those "discussions" but I doubt it will. It's just an opinion.
Harleys seem like nice bikes, and I hear the new one feel good, have long lifespans and I myself have always liked the looks of them. I'd love to ride one or acquire one, but most that I'd want would be around twice the price of something else that performed better that I still liked.
But the thing that I always hear about them is that Harley is not just a bike, it's a lifestyle. The thing is with that though, is that it's misleading to think of it's roots like that and the image in that way - a testament to branding at it's highest. I don't disagree with the FACT that there are enormous amounts of harley riders out there - real ones and bar-hopping weekenders alike. However, I think that commercialism has gotten so many people by the balls at the fact that so many clubs are harley-only.
The whole "biker image" started out with more than just harleys. In fact, if you could imagine Brando (The Wild One) kicked out of a club for owning a triumph then you might be getting my point. The harley brand ended up being the last man standing for a while in the US cruiser market, it did not alone create the image it's pushing.
The whole "lifestyle" still exists within harley, however, harley is only one of the many smaller bubbles inside that whole bubble that is real bikers. Like any sort of branding, the whole elitism and similar-brand ideas makes it simpler for the average weekend warrior midlife-crisis stripped cash-ridden daddy to live the American Dream correctly.
It's a "Harley lifestyle" as much as MotoGP is a "Kawasaki lifestyle".
Harleys seem like nice bikes, and I hear the new one feel good, have long lifespans and I myself have always liked the looks of them. I'd love to ride one or acquire one, but most that I'd want would be around twice the price of something else that performed better that I still liked.
But the thing that I always hear about them is that Harley is not just a bike, it's a lifestyle. The thing is with that though, is that it's misleading to think of it's roots like that and the image in that way - a testament to branding at it's highest. I don't disagree with the FACT that there are enormous amounts of harley riders out there - real ones and bar-hopping weekenders alike. However, I think that commercialism has gotten so many people by the balls at the fact that so many clubs are harley-only.
The whole "biker image" started out with more than just harleys. In fact, if you could imagine Brando (The Wild One) kicked out of a club for owning a triumph then you might be getting my point. The harley brand ended up being the last man standing for a while in the US cruiser market, it did not alone create the image it's pushing.
The whole "lifestyle" still exists within harley, however, harley is only one of the many smaller bubbles inside that whole bubble that is real bikers. Like any sort of branding, the whole elitism and similar-brand ideas makes it simpler for the average weekend warrior midlife-crisis stripped cash-ridden daddy to live the American Dream correctly.
It's a "Harley lifestyle" as much as MotoGP is a "Kawasaki lifestyle".