Pay to fix, learn to fix, sell or junk?
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 7:22 pm
Hi all,
A few years ago I purchased my first bike, a '94 Kawasaki Vulcan 500. I rode it for about 6 months without issue until one day the bike would lose power as if there wasn't enough gas getting through, no matter how I cranked the throttle. Sometimes the bike would backfire and then be ok for a bit and then get me home, but I'd still be underpowered. This seemed to be an issue once the bike warmed up or on real hot days.
I took the bike to one guy and he did some things (it was over a year ago so I don't recall what, exactly, he said he did) but the issue was not fixed. I then took it into a Kawasaki dealer and they said something about the cam chain and tensioner probably needing a replacement. The cost from them was pretty high at the time and so I just took the bike home and garaged it because I was very busy with work. Now I am ready to do something about the bike again and I am really into the idea of fixing it myself.
I have many tools (although I know I will need more to work on the bike) and a Clymer manual. So my question to you gurus is should I pay to fix the bike? At the time the dealer, who I know is the most expensive guy to take it to, quoted $800 and this is my least favorite option. Should I learn on this bike and attempt to fix it myself? This has great appeal to me, but I only want to do this if there is a reasonable chance of success without paying more than the value of the bike in parts. I am all for learning and I am pretty mechanically inclined. I have not done anything but the most basic engine maintenance and I did change a starter once. But I feel confident that I can do the job. Or should I sell the bike off for parts or "as-is" cheap? Or should I just junk the thing because perhaps it's not worth it.
I'm in one of those classic "wife says to get rid of the bike" situations. But if I can spend a few weeks or a month learning and actually get the bike running again at a reasonable cost we both would be very happy!
Thanks in advance for your input!
A few years ago I purchased my first bike, a '94 Kawasaki Vulcan 500. I rode it for about 6 months without issue until one day the bike would lose power as if there wasn't enough gas getting through, no matter how I cranked the throttle. Sometimes the bike would backfire and then be ok for a bit and then get me home, but I'd still be underpowered. This seemed to be an issue once the bike warmed up or on real hot days.
I took the bike to one guy and he did some things (it was over a year ago so I don't recall what, exactly, he said he did) but the issue was not fixed. I then took it into a Kawasaki dealer and they said something about the cam chain and tensioner probably needing a replacement. The cost from them was pretty high at the time and so I just took the bike home and garaged it because I was very busy with work. Now I am ready to do something about the bike again and I am really into the idea of fixing it myself.
I have many tools (although I know I will need more to work on the bike) and a Clymer manual. So my question to you gurus is should I pay to fix the bike? At the time the dealer, who I know is the most expensive guy to take it to, quoted $800 and this is my least favorite option. Should I learn on this bike and attempt to fix it myself? This has great appeal to me, but I only want to do this if there is a reasonable chance of success without paying more than the value of the bike in parts. I am all for learning and I am pretty mechanically inclined. I have not done anything but the most basic engine maintenance and I did change a starter once. But I feel confident that I can do the job. Or should I sell the bike off for parts or "as-is" cheap? Or should I just junk the thing because perhaps it's not worth it.
I'm in one of those classic "wife says to get rid of the bike" situations. But if I can spend a few weeks or a month learning and actually get the bike running again at a reasonable cost we both would be very happy!

Thanks in advance for your input!