out growing a bike?
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 7:07 pm
ok i hear this all the time 'i cant get a xxxCC bike because ill outgrow it too fast'.
really what does out growing mean to most people. for me a 600cc bike cruiser/sports is fine for a vet rider. i mean just because you ride a long time doesnt mean suddenly you need a bigger engine to enjoy the bike. people that insist a cruiser has to be 1100 or whatever after a year of riding. but what are the chances the person actually notices any Real difference between the 600 and 1100? try to relate this to a car do you think 'ill start with a 4cylinder but ill have to move up to a v8 once i learn to drive and cant ever go back to the 4 banger again because ive out grown it'. it doesnt seem to work that way. maybe im just missing something. i can understand if you want to progress with riding and take your speeds up higher to match, but if you plan to ride and do the same speeds why a bigger engine?
my 600cc will be just as good in 10 years as it is now for me. unless you plan on doing some serious speeds engine size isnt a factor imo. if it were the case most everyone riding would be on a hayabusa or a valkyrye(sp) as they are the biggest so youd quickly progress to them according to most peoples "outgrowing time line". i mean what happens when you get the 1000cc sports bike suddenly you cant out grow that like you did the 600cc? wheres the line draw for this out growing proccess?
really what does out growing mean to most people. for me a 600cc bike cruiser/sports is fine for a vet rider. i mean just because you ride a long time doesnt mean suddenly you need a bigger engine to enjoy the bike. people that insist a cruiser has to be 1100 or whatever after a year of riding. but what are the chances the person actually notices any Real difference between the 600 and 1100? try to relate this to a car do you think 'ill start with a 4cylinder but ill have to move up to a v8 once i learn to drive and cant ever go back to the 4 banger again because ive out grown it'. it doesnt seem to work that way. maybe im just missing something. i can understand if you want to progress with riding and take your speeds up higher to match, but if you plan to ride and do the same speeds why a bigger engine?
my 600cc will be just as good in 10 years as it is now for me. unless you plan on doing some serious speeds engine size isnt a factor imo. if it were the case most everyone riding would be on a hayabusa or a valkyrye(sp) as they are the biggest so youd quickly progress to them according to most peoples "outgrowing time line". i mean what happens when you get the 1000cc sports bike suddenly you cant out grow that like you did the 600cc? wheres the line draw for this out growing proccess?