Since at least two of you seem to think you know better than "fanboy" mrshake, lets see you prove yourselfs, because I don't believe you can.
I don't care how much you USE linux personally or professionally. I use linux 100% in personal computing, 0% at my day job, and 90% in my personally owned buisness. It doesn't matter, you are still completely missing my point, despite me saying it over and over!Nalian wrote: Mr Shake: given that I use linux for 90% of my personal computing time and 100% of my work time..I don't think I'm missing anything.
So now, blantant name calling. Grow up.jonnythan wrote: Shake's fanboyism is clouding HIS judgment.
OpenBSD, FreeBSD are not linux (FACT)jonnythan wrote: My personal server has run OpenBSD, FreeBSD, or Ubuntu for the past 7 years. I admin Solaris machines and run Ubuntu desktop at work. I am tech support for my gf's dad's Caldera and Mandrake installations. I've been using Linux on a daily basis for years. It's insulting, to say the least, when Shake claims that I "don't know what I'm missing" or some such.
Solaris is not linux (FACT)
My point, as I've made over and over, that you are missing, is that linux is a choice, and, if the average user (read 99% of) were to be given a linux machine in the same state they were given a windows machine (read: OS installed with compatible hardware), they would have NO ISSUES using linux. Thats why I applaud Dell for being a Tier 1 OEM linux provider. Your aparently "missing" that point entirely and depending on weak arguments such as "you have to use windows emulator" or "my sound didn't work"
Try to walk that same 60 year old man through the process of unmounting a drive in windows using their basic admin guis. Or, the next time you CAN'T find a driver because the hardware is unsupported in VISTA, or is to old. Or, the next time you CAN'T change the setting you want in windows because its greyed out to protect you.jonnythan wrote: Walking a 60 year old man through the process of unmounting a drive via CLI is a huge pain in the butt. Having to compile source code drivers and edit text configuration files just to get sound to work is a huge pain in the butt.
People PAY IT professionals to fix these kinds of problems. They don't do it themselfs. People PAY for computers that already have the OS and software installed. What people DON'T commonly do, is buy a computer, then install an os, then install aftermarket parts, then install various software. And, if they were to do the same with windows, they would be fraught with the same type of problems. Incompatable hardware, bad drivers, hard configurations, and yes, even SOUND THAT DOESN'T WORK.
You are a fool to think that windows "just works". That is the biggest fallacy in the computer world. Windows works because OEMS design their PREBUILT systems to work with it. Aftermarket parts and white-box built computers will have problems with linux, very true, but they also will have problems with windows.jonnythan wrote: This is my last word on the subject. When it "just works," and all your hardware is supported out of the box, and all the software you may ever need is listed in the package manager, then, yes, Linux works great, despite the fact that X and most window managers aren't quite as stable as Windows + Explorer. Linux greatly outclasses Windows as a server OS, and Linux is highly serviceable and usable as a desktop OS for the user who wants to invest a lot of time and energy into learning the system, but Linux offers typical users absolutely nothing over Windows and typical problems that users run into are much more difficult to solve in Linux than Windows.
I will state this again...
Linux is a choice
It is NOT right for everyone, in every situation. Neither is Windows.
It is FREE to TRY (hence, a choice) linux. Because of Live CDs, you can try linux without harming your current setup. No harddrive formatting or repartitioning, no saved files, no problem. If you don't like it, who cares. If you do, your now starting down a new path, and that is, in no way, a bad thing.
Anyone who continues to bash Linux with the same old, tired, unfounded arguments that have been used for years, has missed out on what linux has to offer. I am living proof that linux runs STABLE (250+ days online with no desktop crashes, stalls, hangups, bluescreens), can replace all the tasks I was doing in Windows (every single one), is upgradeable, dependable, flexible, and, my favorite part... free of cost.
Now my challenge to the two whom have already played the "I'm a linux expert but..." card. Show me PROOF that what I am saying is wrong. And when I say proof, I dont mean "this one time, I had a sound card that didn't work" I mean, proof that if an OEM purchased Linux computer were used by the average user, they would have problems.
GO, you can't win.