Page 1 of 2
FZ6 and SV650
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 6:46 am
by G3rrity
How are the Yamha FZ6 and Suzuki SV650 as first street bikes? I know they are 600cc+ bikes but they are fairly light weight and boast the standard riding position and substantially less high rpm insane power than the 600+cc sportbikes from what I've been reading. Any thoughts?
Thanks a lot!
Re: FZ6 and SV650
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 6:51 am
by Brackstone
G3rrity wrote:How are the Yamha FZ6 and Suzuki SV650 as first street bikes? I know they are 600cc+ bikes but they are fairly light weight and boast the standard riding position and substantially less high rpm insane power than the 600+cc sportbikes from what I've been reading. Any thoughts?
Thanks a lot!
It's more than just the power of the bike it's the super sensitive brakes, throttle, and handling.
A 600CC sportbike is too big for anyone to start out on.
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:00 am
by Ninja Geoff
The SV650 is considered a "grey area" starter bike. It's on the more powerful end of the starter bike spectrum. It likes to hang out with 650R's and the slightly older 620cc Monsters. The FZ6 prefers the company of 599's, both are a class above the others. If you can honestly say you have some common sense, and the MSF course was easy for you, the SV wouldn't be a bad idea for a first bike. The FZ on the other hand would still be a bit too much.
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:13 am
by Brackstone
Ninja Geoff wrote:If you can honestly say you have some common sense,"
I think this is a logical fallacy. People who don't have common sense think they do which is why bad stuff happens to them.
If people who don't have common sense actually KNEW they didn't have common sense then YouTube would be really
REALLY boring.
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:20 am
by Thumper
The SV is doable as a first bike, but just barely. There's a lot to be learned in throttle control and braking on a smaller bike first, and you'd probably be a better rider in the long run if you spent some time on something like a Ninja 250 or 500 before jumping on an SV.
A lot of people do it, though. They buy an SV right out of the BRC and do just fine. Keep in mind you're looking at a bike with a touchy throttle--it definitely takes a little more finesse to start smoothly on it than it does the bikes in the BRC--and the brakes are a whole lot more powerful. It's a lot easy to lock up the wheels on these bikes than it is on a Rebel or baby Ninja.
And make no mistake, the SV and FZ6 are sport bikes, they're just not liter sportbikes.
Have you looked at something like the Suzuki GS500? It might be a better choice than the SV to start on, and you wouldn't be looking to trade up in a year unless something shiny happens to catch your eye (which is, imo, a perfectly good reason for getting a new bike

)
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:36 am
by camthepyro
I'm going to have to agree with Ninja Geoff on this one. The SV650 is a decent starter bike, albeit still very powerful. If you've taken the MSF course, and especially if you have experience on dirt bikes or something, then it will be fine for you.
I disagree with comments about it having a twitchy throttle. It's not that bad. The power is fairly consistent throughout the RPM range. The brakes are pretty strong, but not as bad as a sportbike. The seating position is standard - not like a sport bike.
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 10:10 am
by Wrider
I'll have to agree with most here... The SV650 is a grey area beginner's bike. But the FZ is a bit too much. It may not have ALL of the high end horsepower but it still has the power to put you on the ground without a problem. I'm trying to get one as my second bike. That's after an 800cc cruiser...
Wrider
Re: FZ6 and SV650
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 11:04 am
by flynrider
G3rrity wrote: I know they are 600cc+ bikes but they are fairly light weight and boast the standard riding position and substantially less high rpm insane power than the 600+cc sportbikes from what I've been reading. Any thoughts?
Thanks a lot!
Not so for the FZ6. I wouldn't say it has "substantially less" power than it's sportbike cousin, the R6. It's mildly de-tuned for low end torque, but still makes close to 100 hp. The throttle response is very much like a sportbike.
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 1:27 am
by IcyHound
I love Mantis (my FZ6) but I am very happy I did not start out on him. I don't think I'd be nearly as comfortable. Little things like being comfortable balancing your bike matter and he is much different to my ninja 500.
A lot of HP, he can be quite jerky with the throttle, very responsive and smooth but things like a short clutch engagement and a high center of balance will throw you off. The brakes are unforgiving as well. I've broken loose my rear wheel twice breaking on slick surfaces and I was trying to be gentle about the entire thing.
I don't think they'd make good first bikes at all. He is a brilliant second bike and I can't see myself replacing him short of major destruction.
Re: FZ6 and SV650
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 1:56 am
by jonnythan
Brackstone wrote:G3rrity wrote:How are the Yamha FZ6 and Suzuki SV650 as first street bikes? I know they are 600cc+ bikes but they are fairly light weight and boast the standard riding position and substantially less high rpm insane power than the 600+cc sportbikes from what I've been reading. Any thoughts?
Thanks a lot!
It's more than just the power of the bike it's the super sensitive brakes, throttle, and handling.
A 600CC bike is too big for anyone to start out on.
I hate when people boil it down to displacement like this.
There are a lot of bikes with displacements up to 800 or 900 cc that are entirely fine starter bikes.