Page 1 of 2
looking for the right standard...
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 9:03 am
by gitarjunky
alright guys and gals, its almost here....i take the MSF course on the 1st of sept! totally excited for that, just moved to southern california from chicago and classes are MUCH easier (and surprisingly cheaper!) to get into out here. so, with the license almost taken care of, the bike is going to come soon thereafter. i have decided on a standard, since i'll be moving to LA within the next year and be using the bike in an urban area, i figured a standard would be smaller and more agile than say, a cruiser. the question is now, which one? i'm not looking for sheer 'wrap your eyelids over your head' speed (not yet anyway), but i do want it to be fairly quick. will a 234cc nighthawk do the trick for a 6'0" 180 pound dude like myself? and i also want it to be comfortable and have the option of some saddlebags (for grocerys) since it will be my main mode of transport....sorry 'bout the long post, just thought i'd consult the experts!
see you on the road soon!
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 3:29 pm
by Kal
Nighthawk has the Neutral ergonomics of a standard so you can find a riding position that suits you. I can comfortably put both feet on the floor of a CB when its stopped and dont feel cramped on one.
For street legal riding the Nighthawk will perform. I'm the same weight as you and sligthly taller - my daily rider is half the size and that has done the trick for me nicely over the last year.
The question is how quick do you want to be?
250 Nighhawk has about 20bhp so should be doing about 80mph at the op end.
Aftermarket luggage should not be a problem to find whatever you choose to ride.
Nighthawk home group: http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/honda_nighthawk/
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 7:30 pm
by gitarjunky
hey, thanks kal. yeah thats what i was basing my decision on. 80 mph is plenty for me, as long as it has a good powerband so that i can get quick blips in traffic if i have to to avoid being sqaushed. the only thing that bothers me about the nighthawk is the drum brakes (i'm under the impression that discs are more efficient)...brakes are probably the most important part...should i be concerned about drum brakes on this type of bike?
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 8:46 pm
by JustJames
If you are moving to LA and look for standard, I have just a group for you.Check out this group
http://forum.mildones.org/ they are a bunch of nice and friendly ppl locate across So. Cal. A lot of them riding sportbike, some standard and a few cruiser. You might get an idea along with a group of friend to ride with.
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 9:38 pm
by Analog
gitarjunky wrote:hey, thanks kal. yeah thats what i was basing my decision on. 80 mph is plenty for me, as long as it has a good powerband so that i can get quick blips in traffic if i have to to avoid being sqaushed. the only thing that bothers me about the nighthawk is the drum brakes (i'm under the impression that discs are more efficient)...brakes are probably the most important part...should i be concerned about drum brakes on this type of bike?
I live in the LA area too and I personally think in my
humble, novice opinion, that the nighthawk will be a little sluggish for exactly the reason you just spoke of.... I have a shadow 600vlx and even though I'm not a speed freak and i'm not interested in racing folks whatsoever, I still feel like it could have a little more zip for when I need to pass a Semi quickly and safely... and keep in mind, it's alot more powerful than the nighthawk..
I can't give any feedback about the brakes since I'm a newbie, but if the bike's top speed is 80, keep in mind, there will be those rare occasions when you'll have to kick it up while on these dangerous LA freeways....
I have heard nothing but good stuff about the suzuki GS500... it might be hard to find a used one, but if you can find one, it may be more along the bike you're looking for.
I would look at the buyer's guide on this site for comperable standards w/ a little bit more power, and also look @ motorcycle.com and bikez.com for write ups.
ps-- remember my screen name, and drop me a message when you get your bike... not sure what part of LA you're in, but If you ever want to go riding let me know.
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 6:02 am
by Kal
Disk brakes have more stopping power than drum brakes, but in an emergency situation drum brakes will stop you. Drum brakes are easier to maintain and being more primitive there is less to go wrong with them.
As you are coming into riding rather than coming off of a bike with Disk breaking I shouldnt think you'll have a problem as your riding style will develop to take account of how drum brakes work.
The CB250 develops about a little over half the bhp of the 600vlx, but then it is also half the curbside weight - pays your money and you takes your choice.
Personally I like smallish, lighter bikes I can pick up and flick around, but thats my choice.
I cant see the 250 having too much trouble overtaking a Semi, on a 125 my exposure is about 90 seconds with a Semi running at 60mph. That said I am dropping 400 barrels into the CB250 to give it a bit more punch at higher speeds giving me a top end of 110mph.
The Suzuki's GS series has been around as long as Honda's CB's pretty much, and has very much the same reputation for dependability & rideability. Before I sourced the CB I was looking at the GS, in the end though it came down to the CB being very cheap (£107.50) and ease to work on it.
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 9:06 am
by flynrider
My personal opinion is that the engine found in the little Nighthawk and Rebel might be a bit sluggish for the kind of freeway traffic found in L.A. Sure, it'll eventually get up to 80 mph, but it won't do it quickly. Above 60-65 mph, it's straining and responds very slow to the throttle.
I took a ride on the L.A. freeways a few months back on a couple of 250s. The Rebel seemed to be running at the top end of it's performance envelope the whole time. Surprisingly, when I switched to the Kaw EX250 it was like night and day. That little 250 performed like a champ. With the extra power, I felt quite comfortable on the freeways.
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 9:27 am
by gitarjunky
yeah, see, i was thinking about the ninja 250 too...seems to have gotten good reviews from owners and might be a little quicker...i have always really been eyeing the sv650....its the only motorcycle i've ever rode (my friends) i know the quality/reliability factor is good...i just don't want to get in over my head as far as horsepower/torque goes...i understand the dangers of sportbike in a newbie's hands, no matter how responsible i might consider myself to be...i know they made an sv400s, does any one know if that was ever available in the US? thanks again for all your help..
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 11:46 am
by flynrider
Here's a link to Motorcycle.com's 250 shootout. Interesting reading and dyno data.
http://www.motorcycle.com/mo/mccompare/250shootout.html
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 4:26 am
by Kal
Ouch!!! They dont like the Honda much do they? Its never had the reputation for being outstanding at anything but its always had a reputation for being a decent all round hack.
I'm also feeling a need to play in LA traffic - what makes it so bad?
At the end of the day, you have to ride the bike you buy. The ergonomics of the bike are probably the most important thing, sportsbikes and cruisers are optimised to different riding styles.
It looks like Suzuki didnt offically make the SV400 available to the American market.