LeafsFan wrote:Skier wrote:gujunaid23 wrote:I plan on gettin a used bike. This bike has scratches and was dropped once. It has no dents or any mechanical problems. I saw the nada guide and it stated the value of the bike is $2580. it is a 2001 Suzuki GSX-R. It has 14k miles. Is $2100 a good value for this bike? Please lmk your thoughts.
Thanks.
Junaid

Thankfully, since you're looking at getting a GSX-R, you've already been riding for at the very least a season. Go talk to some of the fellow riders you have met during this time of learning and you can probably find out if it's a good deal or if they know a guy who knows a guy trying to offload a bike on the cheap.
If this is a candidate for your first bike, let me state this clearly:
we will not validate your idea getting a sportsbike for a first bike is a good idea. Instead, we will link to many articles and previous discussions as to why we are correct. You, in turn, will either get offended and leave in a huff or possibly stay and insult our sexual preference, citing anecdotal evidence to, in your mind, validate your posistion.
Boy, I'm cynical today.
Why so bitter? Just because the guy asks whether it is a good deal or not does not mean you have to start acting like he is a squid who wants just one person out of a hundred to say "yah, a newbie can definitely handle this bike!". All he wanted to know is whether it was a good deal or not.
Take the time to read my post: I gave him useful advice. Local riders will have a much better idea of the local market that I ever would, making their advice much, much more appropriate than anything I could give.
LeafsFan wrote:With that said I understand the frustration many of you feel with the amount of people that come on here hoping that someone will crack and say the Gixxer is a great bike to learn on.
I'm glad to hear you understand that position. It gets quite tedious after a while. People do not realize that, just like everyone else, the statistics apply to them.
LeafsFan wrote:However, I just passed the MSF course this past weekend and met three people there who were riding a GSX-R600, Yamaha R6, and a Ninja Z600R. They were all beginners as well. There are lots of people who start on 600CC sport bikes and contrary to what is said on this forum they survive and thrive on these bikes.
And how many riders who started with those kinds of bikes are not around today and we don't know what happened to them?
LeafsFan wrote:Now don't get my wrong, I know where I stand with my motorcycle abilities and to be honest I don't think I could handle that kind of power right away. But my problem with the lower CC books are that they don't look as nice.
If you're into motorcycling for the look, perhaps you should research cheaper ways to "look nice."
LeafsFan wrote: I honestly don't like the looks of the Ninja 500 and the GS500F does not look as nice as a Gixxer or a Yamaha supersport bike. I know many of you will say hell, it is your first bike and you can sell it but I'd rather have a bike I can hold on to for a few years without having to go through the process of selling it and buying a new one.
This has been handled in many a thread. The short of it is you save lots of money and frustration but starting with one of those recommended starter bikes.
LeafsFan wrote:The Ninja 650R that is coming out near the end of this year looks pretty good but the market is not that great for anything <600CCs. Hell, give me the body of a Gixxer on a 500CC and I'd buy it in a second.
Fabricate it yourself. It'd be fun. (Yes, I am serious).
LeafsFan wrote:For many it isn't the power they want but the styling and I don't want to be stuck with a Ninja 500 that looks like it just stepped out of a Mad Max movie.
Riding for an image is, in my opinion, one of the biggest and most dangerous ways to waste money on the planet. I suppose shark-feeding might top it, but just barely.
LeafsFan, to answer your first question, I'm bitter because you can set you watch by these kinds of posts and their inevitable downward spiral, in addition to schoolwork having me down.