Why are Practical Bikes Unpopular?
Why are Practical Bikes Unpopular?
Every time I'm in a motorcycle shop and the sales person asks me what I'm interested in, I tell them no one makes what I'm looking for. I tell them I don't care about performance (sport bikes) or looks (cruisers), but that I just want a practical, low total-cost-of-ownership bike that'll carry stuff -- something like the long-since discontinued Honda Pacific Coast 800. They respond by telling me that no one buys those kinds of bikes.
Is really true? Is there no one out there who just wants to get from point A to point B as inexpensively as possible and doesn't buy based on the ability to accelerate and corner in ways never really possible on realistic streets, or to flash chrome in other's eyes?
Is really true? Is there no one out there who just wants to get from point A to point B as inexpensively as possible and doesn't buy based on the ability to accelerate and corner in ways never really possible on realistic streets, or to flash chrome in other's eyes?
- VermilionX
- Site Supporter - Platinum
- Posts: 5996
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 3:45 pm
- Sex: Male
- Years Riding: 6
- My Motorcycle: '06 Suzuki GSX-R 750
- Location: The Valley, SoCal
Re: Why are Practical Bikes Unpopular?
the smaller bikes can't carry a lot of load but they are very practical and many people buy them.aflundi wrote: Is really true? Is there no one out there who just wants to get from point A to point B as inexpensively as possible and doesn't buy based on the ability to accelerate and corner in ways never really possible on realistic streets, or to flash chrome in other's eyes?
you should just get a used goldwing.
Bikes Owned:
Gixxer 1000 K6 (stolen)
Gixxer 750 K6
Bikes Wanted:
VMAX
a super kewl cafe racer
Gixxer 1000 K6 (stolen)
Gixxer 750 K6
Bikes Wanted:
VMAX
a super kewl cafe racer
- CNF2002
- Site Supporter - Silver
- Posts: 2553
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 1:56 pm
- Sex: Male
- Location: Texas
I like that!MASHBY wrote:If only Honda imported the Deuville into the US sounds like it would be perfect for you:
680cc V-Twin shaft drive
Honda has no info on it on their site...any specs? price?
2002 Buell Blast 500 /¦\
[url=http://www.putfile.com][img]http://x10.putfile.com/3/8221543225.gif[/img][/url]
[url=http://www.totalmotorcycle.com/BBS/viewtopic.php?t=11790]Confessions of a Commuter[/url]
[url=http://www.putfile.com][img]http://x10.putfile.com/3/8221543225.gif[/img][/url]
[url=http://www.totalmotorcycle.com/BBS/viewtopic.php?t=11790]Confessions of a Commuter[/url]
- ZooTech
- Site Supporter - Platinum
- Posts: 3233
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 3:23 am
- Sex: Male
- Years Riding: 18
- My Motorcycle: Nomad / Ninja 500 / VLX Bobber / C3 / VS
- Location: Ohio
Re: Why are Practical Bikes Unpopular?
Sounds like you want a scooter.aflundi wrote:I tell them I don't care about performance (sport bikes) or looks (cruisers), but that I just want a practical, low total-cost-of-ownership bike that'll carry stuff -- something like the long-since discontinued Honda Pacific Coast 800.
the smaller bikes can't carry a lot of load but they are very practical and many people buy them.
Personally I'm OK with smaller bikes except, like you say carrying stuff is a weakness, and shorter lifes push the total-cost-of-ownership up.
The Concours is about the best I could find to date. I was looking to buy one but then backed off as it 1) seemed unnecessarily large and heavy, and 2) though it has hard bags, the bags seemed sort of small.Kawasaki Concours.
If I were more into entertainment with weekend sport riding or touring, I think the Concours would be the "Cats-meow", but for city commuting it just seems a bit excessive.
But, like I say, the Concours is the closest thing to a practical bike I've been able to find.
I've looked into Urals, but low gas mileage, frequent repairs, and (what I thought was an) outragious price for what you get, turned me off. I'm looking for a practical bike, not a project bike.Check out the Urals, they are getting more popular.
- -Holiday
- Legendary 1500
- Posts: 1783
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:36 am
- Sex: Male
- Location: Philadelphia PA
look into a suzuki bergman (scooter) or a honda helix(scooter). I'd say the vstrom(motorcycle) also falls into the category of usefull, but ugly.
Also, older BMW K series bikes can be had for reasonable prices, run forever, often come with hard bags, etc etc.
Stuff is out there.
But like you said, a lot of people are into motorcycles (at least initially) for the image it portrays, not for practical reasons. Hence the big sellers arent the most utilitarian things out there. Another large peprcentage see it as a sport more then a mode of transportation. Nothing wrong with that, but its just the way it is.
Also, older BMW K series bikes can be had for reasonable prices, run forever, often come with hard bags, etc etc.
Stuff is out there.
But like you said, a lot of people are into motorcycles (at least initially) for the image it portrays, not for practical reasons. Hence the big sellers arent the most utilitarian things out there. Another large peprcentage see it as a sport more then a mode of transportation. Nothing wrong with that, but its just the way it is.
2000 Suzuki Bandit 1200s
Vespa Rally 200 in pieces
[img]http://www.brian-payne.com/bikes/VisitedStatesMap.jpg[/img]
Vespa Rally 200 in pieces
[img]http://www.brian-payne.com/bikes/VisitedStatesMap.jpg[/img]
I've lusted over the Deuville for a long time. If only....If only Honda imported the Deuville into the US sounds like it would be perfect for you:
I'd be OK with a scooter as long as it were big enough to ride on the highway except that from what I've seen, a similarly sized motorcycleSounds like you want a scooter.
will cost a lot less, the small wheels will cost you a fortune in tires due to their short life, and the longevity of scooters appears to be pretty short. Figure all that in, and it doesn't appear you get anything even remotely like a low total-cost-of-ownership with a scooter.