Looks like its way of the new emissions - Page 2 - Total Motorcycle Community Forums
BACK TO TOTAL MOTORCYCLE - DAILY MOTORCYCLE NEWS - MOTORCYCLE MODEL REVIEW GUIDES

Total Motorcycle Community Forums

26 Years. 430 Million Readers. 54 years of Motorcycle Guides ∙ Reviews ∙ The friendliest motorcycle community on the internet!

Skip to content

Advanced search
  • Quick links
    • Unanswered topics
    • Active topics
    • Search
  • FAQ
  • Login
  • Register
  • Board index Total Motorcycle Talk Forums Total Motorcycle Talk
  • Search
  • Unanswered topics
  • Active topics

Looks like its way of the new emissions

Post Reply
  • Print view
Advanced search
19 posts
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
Message
Author
User avatar
dieziege
Legendary 1000
Legendary 1000
Posts: 1351
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:49 am

  • Quote

#11 Post by dieziege » Wed Jun 28, 2006 5:16 am

CA is very strict... but the biennial emissions inspections are just for gasoline cars and light trucks... diesel cars (almost impossible to buy in CA now) and motorcycles don't need to be inspected. Most people who drive diesels aren't too into mods but motorcyclists really take advantage of the lack of inspections.

CARB doesn't do the inspections simply because it isn't cost effective. However, if the number of motorcycles increases or the benefit calculation changes or there isn't enough left to squeeze out of cars then bikes will need to be smogged just like cars. That does not mean different emissions standards, just increased enforcement of current standards.

When it comes to stricter standards, I'm all for them.... carbs are nasty things and anything that forces manufacturers to go to fuel injection is good. You can't even say that performance will suffer. And too many bikes are silly loud... there is nothing wrong with mufflers. They are good for cars, good for bikes... even airplanes... I fully intend my airplane (when finished) to have mufflers even though it is legal in the US to run straight pipes on airplane engines. Go to parts of Europe and all light airplanes have mufflers... and the skies are noticeably quieter.

When it comes to inspections... they are a ripoff and I hate them. That's one of the reasons I like diesel cars... and a strong reason for motorcycles... no inspections in CA.
Ride it like you think owning it matters.
Top
User avatar
The Grinch
Elite
Elite
Posts: 245
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 10:22 am
Sex: Male
Location: Mt. Crumpet

  • Quote

#12 Post by The Grinch » Wed Jun 28, 2006 5:34 am

What is funny is that engine noise is also regulated in this emissions update now all we will hear when riding new rides is "zzzsssss."
Sounds good to me. I like quiet. Why do you think I wanted to steal Christmas? So I wouldn't have to hear all the Whos making noise.

Seriously, I think a completely silent bike would be cool. Just the sound of the tires on the road and the wind. Just like my bicycle. Engine noise just sounds too post-industrial to me.
Top
User avatar
DivideOverflow
Legendary 1000
Legendary 1000
Posts: 1318
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 3:19 pm
Sex: Male
Location: Florida, USA

  • Quote

#13 Post by DivideOverflow » Wed Jun 28, 2006 6:22 am

there is a big difference between the legal decibel limit and silence... many bikes are WAY under the limit, and all you hear are their god-awful sewing-machine cams. Most of the japanese cruisers I hear that are stock sound almost sickly...
2008 BMW K1200S
2003 Z1000 - For Sale
1979 KZ650B - Work in progress
2005 Ducati SS 1000DS - sold :'(
1994 VFR750 Interceptor - sold
1984 VF700F Interceptor - sold
2004 Hyosung GV250 - sold
Top
User avatar
flynrider
Site Supporter - Platinum
Site Supporter - Platinum
Posts: 2391
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 1:36 pm
Sex: Male
Years Riding: 30
My Motorcycle: '93 Honda Nighthawk 750
Location: Phoenix, AZ

  • Quote

#14 Post by flynrider » Wed Jun 28, 2006 12:10 pm

dieziege wrote: CARB doesn't do the inspections simply because it isn't cost effective. However, if the number of motorcycles increases or the benefit calculation changes or there isn't enough left to squeeze out of cars then bikes will need to be smogged just like cars. That does not mean different emissions standards, just increased enforcement of current standards.
I don't know about cost effectiveness, but motorcycles have had to pass an annual emissions inspection here in AZ since the 80s. The standards are not the same as for a modern car, they're much lower. They used to run the full test on the rollers at speed, but too many goofballs ended up loosing control of the bikes, so now they just do a useless idle test. I believe the main reason for the motorcycle test requirement is to generated revenue. $19.50 for a 1 min. idle test is making money for somebody.
DivideOverflow wrote: how bad do you think motorcycle emissions are? Unless you are sporting a 2-stroke, they really aren't anything to complain about.
I think you'd be surprised. If you consider that the average car has reduced it's emissions output by 90% in the last 25 yrs, but motorcycles have remained mostly unchanged, there's a lot of room for improvement.

As I posted above, I've had to get both my cage and my bike emissions tested for the last few decades. According to the reports generated, the bike is several times dirtier than the cage. The fuel and ingnition control systems on my bike are in the stone age when compared to a modern cage. If everybody ditched their cages and started riding bikes, smog in large cities would go back to where it was 20 yrs. ago.
Bikin' John
'93 Honda CB750 Nighthawk
Top
MotoF150
Legendary 750
Legendary 750
Posts: 910
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 11:01 pm

  • Quote

#15 Post by MotoF150 » Wed Jun 28, 2006 12:25 pm

did yunzs guys see in the issue of Cycle World they are making a FI 2 stroke engine that has even lower emissions than a regular 4 stroke? Next there will be diesel bikes, or flex fuel bikes running on E85, or how about electric bikes running on a direct drive brushless 3 phaze AC motor? Bikes with giant flywheels, automatic shift bikes that shift to the best fuel economy? WOW I can't wait to see the future of bikes. I wanta be the first that owns one.
2011 Toyota Tacoma 4x4, 09 Yamaha Tmax, 08 Suzuki King Quad 750
Top
User avatar
JC Viper
Legendary 2000
Legendary 2000
Posts: 2198
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 9:12 pm
Real Name: JC
Sex: Male
Years Riding: 7
My Motorcycle: 1984 Kawasaki GPz900R
Location: New York, NY

  • Quote

#16 Post by JC Viper » Wed Jun 28, 2006 12:26 pm

The noise control is actually targeting engine noise so even the rider will not hear much of anything from the bike. I definitely like quiet bikes but not quiet enough where I won't even hear a hum. I need some noise to know the bike is on but not to wake my neighbors.

As for emissions from bikes, many of the bikes past 2002 are pretty clean. The V-strom and BMWs come to mind. I would gladly trade my carbs for FI though.
One thing you can count on: You push a man too far, and sooner or later he'll start pushing back.

Image
Top
User avatar
jmillheiser
Site Supporter - Platinum
Site Supporter - Platinum
Posts: 2515
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 5:27 pm
Sex: Male
Location: Cheyenne, WY

  • Quote

#17 Post by jmillheiser » Wed Jun 28, 2006 3:02 pm

hey Verm. Not only is your Gixxer fuel injected, it has a catalytic converter in the muffler too.

catalysts are no biggie, would be nice if bike manufactuers would put them upstream of the muffler instead of in the muffler. Then you could install an aftermarket exhaust and still have squeaky clean emissions (catback exhausts have been pretty standard in the car performance world for years)
Top
User avatar
icariz83
Elite
Elite
Posts: 198
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 6:18 am

  • Quote

#18 Post by icariz83 » Wed Jun 28, 2006 3:24 pm

IIRC all after market exhausts are illegal so it doesn't matter if it puts out 0 emissions or the amount of 100 18 wheelers.
Current Toys:06 Daytona 675, 06 Sportsman 800
[img]http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y249/Icariz83/misc%20pics/bronco1.gif[/img]
Top
User avatar
Stratus311
Elite
Elite
Posts: 152
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 9:07 am

  • Quote

#19 Post by Stratus311 » Thu Jun 29, 2006 12:55 am

Personally, I think the new emissions standards are a good thing. Fuel Injection is something that has been long awaited. When you have bikes that are 1000cc and up, they are not that far off on the size of a basic Honda Civic engine. Some are even larger in capacity than a Honda Civic 1.5L. And if you think performance will be hindered by emissions equipment, just think; you're bike will now be fuel injected so it will be easier to turbocharge. :D
[img]http://www.careercoders.com/images/Small-pictures/bike-sig.png[/img]
"Fighting for peace is like screwing for virginity."
“When you step on the brakes your life is in your foot's hands”
-George Carlin
Top
Post Reply
  • Print view

19 posts
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2

Return to “Total Motorcycle Talk”

Jump to
  • NEW: Please Login/Register to see ALL forums
  • Total Motorcycle Talk Forums
  • ↳   Start Your Engines - Introduce Yourself
  • ↳   Total Motorcycle Talk
  • News, Events and Stories
  • Total Motorcycle Garage Forums
  • Reviews
  • Rider Cafe'
  • Off Topic!
  • Total Motorcycle General
  • Board index
  • All times are UTC-11:00
  • Delete cookies
  • Contact us

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited

Privacy | Terms

 

 

TMW Privacy Policy - Forum Privacy Policy - Terms and Conditions

Follow us on X / Twitter - Facebook - YouTube - Pinterest - Instagram - News RSS Feed