Another which bike...semi-complicated

Message

#21 Post by **bok** » Wed Jul 19, 2006 8:13 am

NathanM wrote:
bok wrote:
top speed is only 133
which is "only" double the posted limit on most highways you poor thing
I didn't say I'd be doing 133 on the streets so plase don't make that assumption.

please don't make the assumption that the

meant that i was being serious..i swear the sarcasm detector around here is broken sometimes

NathanM · #22 Post by **NathanM** » Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:14 am

bok wrote:
NathanM wrote:
bok wrote:
top speed is only 133
which is "only" double the posted limit on most highways you poor thing
I didn't say I'd be doing 133 on the streets so plase don't make that assumption.
please don't make the assumption that the meant that i was being serious..i swear the sarcasm detector around here is broken sometimes

After Mr. Chicken's post my sarcasm detector got clicked off...I just kinda got into a quote and rebuttal mood...no worries

#23 Post by **bok** » Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:24 am

no worries, it's not very easy to distinguish intent in the written word sometimes. people write like they talk and know the tone they would be speaking in, but you miss inflection, tone, and facial expressions that would be a dead give away if you weren't just looking at text.

i'm as guilty of it as the next guy ...unless the next guy is typing in braille. (since i don't know how many raised dots it would take to make a smilie let me say this was a joke)

**edited to be a tad more coherent

NathanM · #24 Post by **NathanM** » Wed Jul 19, 2006 10:38 am

bok wrote:no worries, it's not very easy to distinguish intent in the written word sometimes. people write like they talk and know the tone they would be speaking in, but you miss inflection, tone, and facial expressions that are dead give aways when just looking at text.
i'm as guilty of it as the next guy ...unless the next guy is typing in braille, since i don't know how many raised dots it would take to make a smilie

wurd