Kal wrote:This usually the point in time I point out that the Battle of Britain had been fought and won with Operation Sealion being cancelled over a year before America joined the war.
I have to point out, as noble as Britain's combat performance was, by 1941 the country was economically prostrate. If the USA hadn't joined the combat effort in Dec. '41, Britain would have likely had to make peace and withdraw. The will was there, but the wherewithal wasn't.
To switch gears back to terrorists, it's interesting that 25-30 years ago this kind of thing usually had Maoist origins rather than Islamist. Maoists were another group of people quite willing to use violence to forcibly impose their world view on others. (Anyone read Bruce Bawer's book, "When Europe Slept"?) I disagree with the view that Islamist terrorism is the natural and defensible reaction of people to the cultural homogenization of their homelands. No, it is an effort to impose their value system on the rest of us, and if they die trying, according to their belief system, so much the better. Regardless of what evil other religions may have committed in other times, Islamist terrorism is the curse of our century -- there are no other religions blowing people up nowadays.