While I may or may not agree with your sentiment, the act of copying something is very different from the act of taking or consuming a physical object.anarchy wrote:i think your reasoning has me shaking my head...blues2cruise wrote:The music industry needs to give its head a shake on some things. My friend and I share music.
She sometimes will burn a CD for me of something that she bought. The music industry isn't losing out, because it's not music I would have bought in the first place. She will also copy something I own, but that she wouldn't have bought.
Nobody is losing any royalties. Besides, we all pay the extra fee on blank media now to offset the few cents they think they have lost.
you're saying that based on the mere fact your and your friend(s) wouldn't have bought the music in the first place means the music industry (or whoever) isn't losing music when you share it?? somehow i don't think the music industry sees it that way. i'm sure they're of the belief that if someone doesn't want to pay for the music, they shouldn't have it...
if you still believe your logic holds water, try this... go into an eating establishment that has an all you can eat food buffet... bring along couple of friends that wouldn't want to pay for the buffet - hell, i'll go with you. start getting food and sharing with your friends... let the management know it's okay because they wouldn't have normally paid for that food anyway...
When you give a piece of pizza to your friend, someone had to pay for that piece of pizza to be made. When you email a copy of a song to a friend, the copy was entirely free at no cost to anyone.