So who will it be for everyone this time?

for the Presidential Nominee?

Barack Obama
18
46%
John McCain
9
23%
Independent/other
6
15%
You don't care until November comes by...
0
No votes
Or you weren't planning to vote anyway.
6
15%
 
Total votes: 39

Message
Author
User avatar
matthew5656
Legendary 300
Legendary 300
Posts: 359
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:03 pm
Sex: Male
My Motorcycle: '98 Honda VTR
Location: Denver, CO

#111 Unread post by matthew5656 »

Misguided Missle wrote:Wrting in Ron Paul wount be the RIGHT thing to do.

Except it will hand the election to Obama, whom is going to take all guns, and turn America into a soicalist union called the NAU.

So are all forced to vote for the other liberal candidate, McLame.

If not, in 5 years there will be fighting in the streets.

I see there is way to many clueless liberals here for me to hang.

The line had been drawn, you have been warned.

You all can have your North American Union.

look it up. Even Obama's wife said"

" You better vote for Barrak, it is the last chance to have an black US President."

She knows something, you all dont.

Bye
Can anyone honestly, truly believe any president in today's history would attempt to confiscate everybody's weapons and ammo? Would that really be allowed to happen? Or is it just more of what every McCain lover wants you to think?

And what evidence do you have that McCain will not support and allow the NAFTA superhighway project and the foundation of an inevitable NAU? Please don't give him that much credit.

And what source do you have of BO's wife retorting that we must all vote for him because he is our last black president?

User avatar
ofblong
Legendary 2500
Legendary 2500
Posts: 2638
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 6:51 pm
Real Name: Ben
Sex: Male
Years Riding: 4
My Motorcycle: 1996 Honda Shadow Deluxe VLX
Location: Michigan

#112 Unread post by ofblong »

matthew5656 wrote:
Misguided Missle wrote:Wrting in Ron Paul wount be the RIGHT thing to do.

Except it will hand the election to Obama, whom is going to take all guns, and turn America into a soicalist union called the NAU.

So are all forced to vote for the other liberal candidate, McLame.

If not, in 5 years there will be fighting in the streets.

I see there is way to many clueless liberals here for me to hang.

The line had been drawn, you have been warned.

You all can have your North American Union.

look it up. Even Obama's wife said"

" You better vote for Barrak, it is the last chance to have an black US President."

She knows something, you all dont.

Bye
Can anyone honestly, truly believe any president in today's history would attempt to confiscate everybody's weapons and ammo? Would that really be allowed to happen? Or is it just more of what every McCain lover wants you to think?

And what evidence do you have that McCain will not support and allow the NAFTA superhighway project and the foundation of an inevitable NAU? Please don't give him that much credit.

And what source do you have of BO's wife retorting that we must all vote for him because he is our last black president?
LOL and more bs of what you dont understand.

australia lost gun rights crime rises 300%
europe lost gun rights crime rises 300%

Obama sure can and from how he talks will try to take my right to bear arms away. I am sorry but having the thought of a 300% higher chance my daughter could get raped because some freak knows she cant carry a gun just scares the hell out of me. If you would have read any of my posts I dont like McCain nor Obama but because I want the right to bear arms (and many other reasons stated in my link) I WILL vote for McCain. If you think Obama isnt a liar your more naive than we could ever imagine.
96' Honda Shadow Deluxe VLX
Dream bike: Ducati Multistrada 1100S
[img]http://hdbits.org/pic/smilies/hdlove.gif[/img]

Shorts
Site Supporter - Gold
Site Supporter - Gold
Posts: 3452
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 7:42 pm

#113 Unread post by Shorts »

matthew5656 wrote: Can anyone honestly, truly believe any president in today's history would attempt to confiscate everybody's weapons and ammo? Would that really be allowed to happen? Or is it just more of what every McCain lover wants you to think?

Of course he will.

FACT: Barack Obama opposes four of the five Supreme Court justices who affirmed an individual right to keep and bear arms. He voted against the confirmation of Alito and Roberts and he has stated he would not have appointed Thomas or Scalia.17

FACT: Barack Obama voted for an Illinois State Senate bill to ban and confiscate “assault weapons,” but the bill was so poorly crafted, it would have also banned most semi-auto and single and double barrel shotguns commonly used by sportsmen.18

FACT: Barack Obama voted to allow reckless lawsuits designed to bankrupt the firearms industry.1

FACT: Barack Obama wants to re-impose the failed and discredited Clinton Gun Ban.15

FACT: Barack Obama voted to ban almost all rifle ammunition commonly used for hunting and sport shooting.3

FACT: Barack Obama has endorsed a 500% increase in the federal excise tax on firearms and ammunition.9

FACT: Barack Obama has endorsed a complete ban on handgun ownership.2

FACT: Barack Obama supports local gun bans in Chicago, Washington, D.C., and other cities.4

FACT: Barack Obama voted to uphold local gun bans and the criminal prosecution of people who use firearms in self-defense.5

FACT: Barack Obama supports gun owner licensing and gun registration.6

FACT: Barack Obama refused to sign a friend-of-the-court Brief in support of individual Second Amendment rights in the Heller case.

FACT: Barack Obama opposes Right to Carry laws.7

FACT: Barack Obama was a member of the Board of Directors of the Joyce Foundation, the leading source of funds for anti-gun organizations and “research.”8

FACT: Barack Obama supported a proposal to ban gun stores within 5 miles of a school or park, which would eliminate almost every gun store in America.9

FACT: Barack Obama voted not to notify gun owners when the state of Illinois did records searches on them.10

FACT: Barack Obama voted against a measure to lower the Firearms Owners Identification card age minimum from 21 to 18, a measure designed to assist young people in the military.11

FACT: Barack Obama favors a ban on standard capacity magazines.12

FACT: Barack Obama supports mandatory micro-stamping.13

FACT: Barack Obama supports mandatory waiting periods.2

FACT: Barack Obama supports repeal of the Tiahrt Amendment, which prohibits information on gun traces collected by the BATFE from being used in reckless lawsuits against firearm dealers and manufacturers.14

FACT: Barack Obama supports one-gun-a-month handgun purchase restrictions.16

FACT: Barack Obama supports a ban on inexpensive handguns.9

FACT: Barack Obama supports a ban on the resale of police issued firearms, even if the money is going to police departments for replacement equipment.9

FACT: Barack Obama supports mandatory firearm training requirements for all gun owners and a ban on gun ownership for persons under the age of 21.9

1. United States Senate, S. 397, vote number 219, July 29, 2005. (http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/r ... vote=00219)

2. Independent Voters of Illinois/Independent Precinct Organization general candidate questionnaire, Sept. 9, 1996. The responses on this survey were described in “Obama had greater role on liberal survey,” Politico, March 31, 2008. (http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0308/9269.html)

3. United States Senate, S. 397, vote number 217, Kennedy amendment July 29, 2005. (http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/r ... vote=00217)

4. David Wright, Ursula Fahy and Sunlen Miller, "Obama: 'Common Sense Regulation' On Gun Owners' Rights," ABC News' "Political Radar" Blog, http://blogs.abcnews.com, 2/15/08. (http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar ... on-se.html)

5. Illinois Senate, SB 2165, March 25, 2004, vote 20 and May 25, 2004, vote 3.

6. “Fact Check: No News In Obama's Consistent Record.” Obama ’08, December 11, 2007. (http://www.barackobama.com/factcheck/20 ... amas_c.php)

7. “Candidates' gun control positions may figure in Pa. vote,” Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, Wednesday, April 2, 2008, and "Keyes, Obama Are Far Apart On Guns," Chicago Tribune, 9/15/04. (http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsbu ... 60181.html)

8. 1998 Joyce Foundation Annual Report, p. 7.

9. “Obama and Gun Control,” The Volokh Conspiracy, taken from the Chicago Defender, Dec. 13, 1999. (http://www.volokh.com/posts/1203389334.shtml)

10. Illinois Senate, May 5, 2002, SB 1936 Con., vote 26.

11. Illinois Senate, March 25, 2003, SB 2163, vote 18.

12. “Clinton, Edwards, Obama on gun control,” Radio Iowa, Sunday, April 22, 2007. (http://learfield.typepad.com/radioiowa/ ... wards.html)

13. Chicago Tribune blogs, “Barack Obama: NIU Shootings call for action,” February 15, 2008, (http://blogs.trb.com/news/politics/blog ... shoot.html)

14. Barack Obama campaign website: “As president, Barack Obama would repeal the Tiahrt Amendment . . .” (http://www.barackobama.com/issues/urban ... nforcement.)

15. Illinois Senate Debate #3: Barack Obama vs. Alan Keyes (http://www.ontheissues.org/2008/Barack_ ... ontrol.htm and http://www.ontheissues.org/IL_2004_Senate_3rd.htm) Oct 21, 2004.

16. Illinois Senate, May 16, 2003, HB 2579, vote 34.

17. United States Senate vote 245, September 29, 2005 and vote 2, January 31, 2006 and Saddleback Forum, August 16, 2008.

18. Illinois Senate Judiciary Committee, March 13, 2003. To see the vote tally go to: http://www.nrapvf.org/Media/pdf/sb1195_obama.pdf.


http://www.gunbanobama.com/Default.aspx ... 2463d99f08





Offhand, does DC Gun Ban ring a bell?? Have you heard of DC vs Heller? Did you know cops went door to door looking for guns, trying to search houses without warrants?

Some states already only 'allow' FMJ for citizen use for CCW only (NJ). Some states require "gun registration" <-- can you tell me what "gun registration" is?

Some reading:

Illinois State Rifle Association Executive Director Richard Pearson Issues Open Letter to Nation's Sportsmen Regarding Obama's History in the Illinois Senate

Last update: 1:06 a.m. EDT Oct. 15, 2008
CHICAGO, Oct 15, 2008 /PRNewswire-USNewswire via COMTEX/ -- The following is the text of an open letter to the nation's hunters and sportsmen issued today by Illinois State Rifle Association Executive

Director Richard Pearson:

Fellow Sportsman,
Hello, my name is Rich Pearson and I have been active in the firearm rights movement for over 40 years. For the past 15 years, I have served in the Illinois state capitol as the chief lobbyist for the Illinois State Rifle Association.

I lobbied Barack Obama extensively while he was an Illinois State Senator. As a result of that experience, I know Obama's attitudes toward guns and gun owners better than anyone. The truth be told, in all my years in the Capitol I have never met a legislator who harbors more contempt for the law-abiding firearm owner than does Barack Obama.
Although Obama claims to be an advocate for the 2nd Amendment, his voting record in the Illinois Senate paints a very different picture. While a state senator, Obama voted for a bill that would ban nearly every hunting rifle, shotgun and target rifle owned by Illinois citizens. That same bill would authorize the state police to raid homes of gun owners to forcibly confiscate banned guns. Obama supported a bill that would shut down law-abiding firearm manufacturers including Springfield Armory, Armalite, Rock River Arms and Les Baer. Obama also voted for a bill that would prohibit law-abiding citizens from purchasing more than one gun per month.

Without a doubt, Barack Obama has proven himself to be an enemy of the law abiding firearm owner. At the same time, Obama has proven himself to be a friend to the hardened criminal. While a state senator, Obama voted 4 times against legislation that would allow a homeowner to use a firearm in defense of home and family.
Does Barack Obama still sound to you like a "friend" of the law-abiding gun owner?


And speaking of friends, you can always tell a person by the company they keep. Obama counts among his friends the Rev. Michael Pfleger - a renegade Chicago priest who has openly called for the murder of gun shop owners and pro-gun legislators. Then there is his buddy Richard Daley, the mayor of Chicago who has declared that if it were up to him, nobody would be allowed to own a gun. And let's not forget Obama's pal George Soros - the guy who has pumped millions of dollars into the UN's international effort to disarm law-abiding citizens.
Obama has shown that he is more than willing to use other people's money to fund his campaign to take your guns away from you. While a board member of the leftist Joyce Foundation, Barack Obama wrote checks for tens of millions of dollars to extremist gun control organizations such as the Illinois Council Against Handgun Violence and the Violence Policy Center.

Does Barack Obama still sound to you like a "friend" of the law-abiding gun owner?

By now, I'm sure that many of you have received mailings from an organization called "American Hunters and Shooters Association(AHSA)" talking about what a swell fellow Obama is and how he honors the 2nd Amendment and how you will never have to worry about Obama coming to take your guns. Let me make it perfectly clear - everything the AHSA says about Obama is pure hogwash. The AHSA is headed by a group of left-wing elitists who subscribe to the British view of hunting and shooting. That is, a state of affairs where hunting and shooting are reserved for the wealthy upper-crust who can afford guided hunts on exclusive private reserves. The AHSA is not your friend, never will be.
In closing, I'd like to remind you that I'm a guy who has actually gone nose to nose with Obama on gun rights issues. The Obama I know cannot even begin to identify with this nation's outdoor traditions. The Obama I know sees you, the law abiding gun owner, as nothing but a low-class lummox who is easily swayed by the flash of a smile and a ration of rosy rhetoric. The Obama I know is a stony-faced liar who has honed his skill at getting what he wants - so long as people are willing to give it to him.

That's the Barack Obama I know.

The ISRA is the state's leading advocate of safe, lawful and responsible firearms ownership. Founded in 1903, the ISRA has represented the interests of millions of law-abiding Illinois firearm owners.
WEB SITE: http://www.isra.org
SOURCE Illinois State Rifle Association

http://www.isra.org



Read more:


http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/fund ... fndid=5310


The Joyce Foundation

http://www.joycefdn.org/Programs/GunViolence/






Obama's Joyce Foundation Silence
=========
October 6, 2008 - by David T. Hardy

As a presidential candidate, Barack Obama must demonstrate executive experience, but he remains strangely silent about his eight years (1994-2002) as a director of the Joyce Foundation, a billion dollar tax-exempt organization. He has one obvious reason: during his time as director, Joyce Foundation spent millions creating and supporting anti-gun organizations.

There is another, less known, reason.

During Obama’s tenure, the Joyce Foundation board planned and implemented a program targeting the Supreme Court. The work began five years into Obama’s directorship, when the Foundation had experience in turning its millions into anti-gun “grassroots” organizations, but none at converting cash into legal scholarship.

The plan’s objective was bold: the judicial obliteration of the Second Amendment.

Joyce’s directors found a vulnerable point. When judges cannot rely upon past decisions, they sometimes turn to law review articles. Law reviews are impartial, and famed for meticulous cite-checking. They are also produced on a shoestring. Authors of articles receive no compensation; editors are law students who work for a tiny stipend.

In 1999, midway through Obama’s tenure, the Joyce board voted to grant the Chicago-Kent Law Review $84,000, a staggering sum by law review standards. The Review promptly published an issue in which all articles attacked the individual right view of the Second Amendment.

In a breach of law review custom, Chicago-Kent let an “outsider” serve as editor; he was Carl Bogus, a faculty member of a different law school. Bogus had a unique distinction: he had been a director of Handgun Control Inc. (today’s Brady Campaign), and was on the advisory board of the Joyce-funded Violence Policy Center.

Bogus solicited only articles hostile to the individual right view of the Second Amendment, offering authors $5,000 each. But word leaked out, and Prof. Randy Barnett of Boston University volunteered to write in defense of the individual right to arms. Bogus refused to allow him to write for the review, later explaining that “sometimes a more balanced debate is best served by an unbalanced symposium.” Prof. James Lindgren, a former Chicago-Kent faculty member, remembers that when Barnett sought an explanation he “was given conflicting reasons, but the opposition of the Joyce Foundation was one that surfaced at some time.” Joyce had bought a veto power over the review’s content.

Joyce Foundation apparently believed it held this power over the entire university. Glenn Reynolds later recalled that when he and two other professors were scheduled to discuss the Second Amendment on campus, Joyce’s staffers “objected strenuously” to their being allowed to speak, protesting that Joyce Foundation was being cheated by an “‘agenda of balance’ that was inconsistent with the Symposium’s purpose.” Joyce next bought up an issue of Fordham Law Review.

The plan worked smoothly. One court, in the course of ruling that there was no individual right to arms, cited the Chicago-Kent articles eight times. Then, in 2001, a federal Court of Appeals in Texas determined that the Second Amendment was an individual right.

The Joyce Foundation board (which still included Obama) responded by expanding its attack on the Second Amendment. Its next move came when Ohio State University announced it was establishing the “Second Amendment Research Center” as a thinktank headed by anti-individual-right historian Saul Cornell. Joyce put up no less than $400,000 to bankroll its creation. The grant was awarded at the board’s December 2002 meeting, Obama’s last function as a Joyce director. In reporting the grant, the OSU magazine Making History made clear that the purpose was to influence a future Supreme Court case:

“The effort is timely: a series of test cases - based on a new wave of scholarship, a recent decision by a federal Court of Appeals in Texas, and a revised Justice Department policy-are working their way through the courts. The litigants challenge the courts’ traditional reading of the Second Amendment as a protection of the states’ right to organize militia, asserting that the Amendment confers a much broader right for individuals to own guns. The United States Supreme Court is likely to resolve the debate within the next three to five years.”

(45:17-18; online link; slow).

The Center proceeded to generate articles denying the individual right to arms. The OSU connection also gave Joyce an academic money laundry. When it decided to buy an issue of the Stanford Law and Policy Review, it had a cover. Joyce handed OSU $125,000 for that purpose; all the law review editors knew was that OSU’s Foundation granted them that breathtaking sum, and a helpful Prof. Cornell volunteered to organize the issue. (The review was later sufficiently embarassed to publish an open letter on the affair).

The Joyce directorate’s plan almost succeeded. The individual rights view won out in the Heller Supreme Court appeal, but only by 5-4. The four dissenters were persuaded in part by Joyce-funded writings, down to relying on an article which misled them on critical historical documents.

Having lost that fight, Obama now claims he always held the individual rights view of the Second Amendment, and that he “respects the constitutional rights of Americans to bear arms.” But as a Joyce director, Obama was involved in a wealthy foundation’s attempt to manipulate the Supreme Court, buy legal scholarship, and obliterate the individual right to arms.

Voters who value the Constitution should ask whether someone who was party to that plan should be nominating future Supreme Court justices.

David T. Hardy has practiced law since 1975. He has five books and thirteen law review articles in print, and blogs at Of Arms and the Law. He's also the producer of the documentary In Search of the Second Amendment.

http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/obama-and- ... amendment/


Anyone know why BO tried to ban NRA ads at the end of Sept but is now running one of his own?


http://www.gunbanobama.com/


Watch the vids, then ask me questions and I'll explain why its a bad thing.
Last edited by Shorts on Sat Oct 18, 2008 1:13 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Shorts
Site Supporter - Gold
Site Supporter - Gold
Posts: 3452
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 7:42 pm

#114 Unread post by Shorts »


GUN CONTROL: COMMON SENSE OR COMMON CAUSE?




By Howard Nemerov

October 4, 2008

NewsWithViews.com

RENO - Sen. Barack Obama said Tuesday he is “a strong supporter of the Second Amendment” and will not try take Americans’ guns away if elected.

“I believe it’s an individual right,” he said in an interview following Tuesday’s speech at [University of Nevada, Reno]. “Lawful gun owners have nothing to fear from an Obama Administration.”

But, Obama said, he is for “some common sense gun safety laws.” He said that means keeping weapons out of the hands of criminals, the mentally ill and children.

“And we need a system that makes sure we can trace guns back to the original owners and dealers.”[1]

What Obama isn’t saying is that in order to “trace guns to the original owners” we must enact national gun owner licensing and registration for each gun purchased. Such policies have both historical and future significance.

Brief History of Registration Leading to Confiscation

There is documented evidence that registration and licensing leads to confiscation, often with horrible unintended results.

In 1928, the Weimar republic enacted firearms law which required licensing; these were available only to “persons of unquestioned trustworthiness.” Those not entitled to possess firearms were ordered to surrender them immediately. Entire classes of people–– such as gypsies––were automatically denied.[2] Eventually, the Nazis used the 1928 Weimar law to disarm Jews, beginning the well-documented Holocaust.[3]

In 1870, the British government proposed a gun licensing bill creating a national firearms registry.[4] A series of ever-stricter regulations culminated in the Firearms Act of 1997, which banned handguns and placed severe limits on other firearms ownership. Interestingly, the Home Office withheld its own research which discredited the need for this ban: constabulary areas with higher firearms ownership rates had lower rates of firearms homicide.[5]

Between 1995 and 2006, Britain’s violent crime rate increased 29.2%, led by a 75.6% increase in rape.[6] Australia is another gun ban country with licensing and registration, as well as severe restrictions on gun ownership.[7] Between 1995 and 2006, the violent crime rate increased 39.1%, with assaults increasing 46.7% and rape increasing 21.4%.[8] In the United States, about 5 million guns are sold each year.[9] Between 1995 and 2006, the U.S. violent crime dropped 30.8%, and rape decreased 16.4%.[10] Women are now raped about twice as often in the UK and nearly three times as often in Australia. Today in the UK, criminals can buy whatever gun they want, and handguns are the most desirable because they are light and easy to conceal.[11] The Home Office’s concealed report was an accurate but dark prophesy.

Return on Investment: The Future of Registration

In politics, it is often difficult to determine why a person supports a policy. Fortunately, numbers speak louder than words: In this case, follow the money to understand Obama’s support of registration.

One of Obama’s biggest donors is the law firm of Skadden, Arps, Meagher and Flom, LLP, which contributed $340,264 to his presidential campaign as of September 2, 2008.[12] Skadden, Arps represents the inventors of a “firearm safety system,” patent number 6499243, which adds a biometric activator that links a gun to one owner. The “Summary of the Invention” section of the patent application notes:

The safety system further makes use of a person’s fingerprint data, which is a unique personal property that is highly suitable for tracking and control.[13] [Emphasis added]

Sidley Austin LLP has contributed $350,302 to Obama.[14] Sidley Austin represents the inventors of the “Gun identification kit,” patent number 7380706. This invention provides a way for every gun to have a spent cartidge case made available for entry into a ballistic “fingerprint” database. Of course, such a database is useful only if all firearms are entered into it:

Because the vast majority of publicly owned firearms have not been used in the commission of a crime, they will not show up in [such a] database. It would therefore be desirable to provide a means for increasing the number of firearms for which…information and data is available.

The inventors’ solution to this? Pass a law mandating that every gun is registered (serial number matched with shell casing and owner data, all permanently recorded):

One means of populating [such a] database would be to mandate that ballistic information be obtained and entered into the database for all firearms.[15]

Registration and licensing have consistently proven ineffective in combating crime. Two of Obama’s major campaign contributors represent clients who would earn fortunes from firearms registration. As has been said before, follow the money if you want to divine a candidate’s true motives.

Endnotes:

1- Geoff Dornan, Obama promises support for gun owners, Nevada Appeal, October 1, 2008.
2- Stephen P. Halbrook, party Firearms Law and the Disarming of the German Jews, Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, No. 3, 483-535 (2000), pages 487-9.
3- Ibid, pages 504-505.
4- Joyce Lee Malcolm, Guns and Violence: The English Experience, Harvard University Press, copyright 2002, pages 117-9.
5- Ibid, pages 204-205.
6- Crime incidents cited from Crime in England and Wales 2006/2007, Home Office, pages 36-42. Rates calculated using population estimates from UK Statistics Authority.
7- For discussion of Australian gun regulation, see Reuter and Mouzos, Australia: A Massive Buyback of Low-Risk Guns, 2002, page 125
8- Crime incidents cited from Brian Pink, Recorded Crime - Victims, 2006, Australian Bureau of Statistics, June 6, 2007, pages 8-9. Rates calculated using population estimates from Population by Age and Sex, Australia, 2006.
9- Small Arms Production in the United States, National Shooting Sports Foundation, 2008.
10- Table 1 - Crime in the United States by Volume and Rate per 100,000 Inhabitants, 1988–2007, Federal Bureau of Investigation.
11-, Duncan Campbell, Firearms: cheap, easy to get and on a street near you, The Guardian, August 30, 2008
12-, Open Secrets, Barack Obama, Top Contributors, Center for Responsive Politics
13-, Firearm safety system, Patent #6499243, patent issued December 31, 2002
14-, Open Secrets, Barack Obama, Top Contributors, Center for Responsive Politics.
15- Gun identification kit, Patent #7380706

© 2008 Howard Nemerov - All Rights Reserved


http://www.newswithviews.com/Nemerov/howard107.htm

Shorts
Site Supporter - Gold
Site Supporter - Gold
Posts: 3452
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 7:42 pm

#115 Unread post by Shorts »

Well, that was quick. Pointless, but quick

Yesterday, I asked Senator Obama to support Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison’s efforts to pressure Senator Harry Reid to bring H.R. 6842 up for a Senate vote. I did so with exactly zero expectation that Obama would sign the letter–the intent was simply to highlight the contrast between reality and Obama’s relentless efforts to convince gun owners that he’s on our side.

To my surprise, I have already received a reply.

Dear Kurt:

Thank you for contacting me regarding gun policy. I appreciate hearing your perspective on this important issue.

I respect the Second Amendment and responsible gun ownership. But I am also concerned about the human consequences of guns falling into the wrong hands and being misused. I do not find objectionable the goal of keeping firearms out of the hands of children, terrorists, gang members and criminals in general. The question for me is how to best accomplish that goal without abridging the rights of hunters, sportsmen, and other legitimate gun owners. As I consider gun legislation, I will work to find the appropriate balance between these two objectives.

For example, Senator David Vitter (R-LA), in response to complaints about the confiscation of firearms during the recovery from Hurricane Katrina, offered an amendment that would prohibit such confiscations in areas hit by natural disaster. I voted with Senator Vitter on this amendment. On the other hand, I support the re-imposition of the ban on the sale of assault weapons that expired in September 2004 because I believe these guns are used primarily for criminal rather than sporting intent. I also support requiring gun manufacturers to install child safety locks on all of their products.

Again, I have always believed that the Second Amendment protects the right of individuals to bear arms, but I also identify with the need for crime-ravaged communities to save their children from the violence that plagues our streets through common-sense, effective safety measures. I do not believe that these two principles – the individual right and the rights of a community to maintain public safety – are contradictory.

On June 26, 2008, the Supreme Court endorsed that same view. Although it ruled that the D.C. gun ban went too far, Justice Scalia himself acknowledged that this right is not absolute and subject to reasonable regulations enacted by local communities to keep their streets safe.

Anyone who lives in a large urban center like Chicago is aware of the terrible toll gun violence is taking on American society. As a statewide elected official who has traveled our state extensively, I appreciate how strongly sportsmen, hunters and collectors feel about their rights to own firearms. But I am convinced we can more aggressively attack the problem of gun violence without interfering with the rights of responsible gun owners.

Again, thank you for contacting me. I look forward to keeping in touch.

Sincerely,

Barack Obama
United States Senator


Nothing like breaking one’s fast on canned . . . nothing, is there?

Anyway, I’ll take that as a “No” to my request that he sign the letter.



http://armedandfree.wordpress.com/2008/ ... but-quick/

slimcolo
Legendary 1000
Legendary 1000
Posts: 1232
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 7:33 pm
Sex: Male
Location: Colorado/USA/NA

#116 Unread post by slimcolo »

When the choices are Hitler and Stalin, the ones who don't vote are the only ones who do have the right to complain. And yet the American peasants continue to be vehemently partisan, one group insisting that we should be the slaves of Obama, and one insisting that we should be the slaves of McCain.
by Larken Rose

http://www.populistamerica.com/home

http://jumptheturnstyle.com/?p=660

What about Bobby Black
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fu ... id=2003400

or Bob Barr
http://www.lp.org/

or Chuck Baldwin
http://www.constitutionparty.com/

or Gene Amondson
http://www.geneamondson.com/prohibition-party-2004.html

or Brian Moore
http://www.sp-usa.org/

or Cynthia McKinney
http://www.gp.org/index.php

To hell with them I'm writing in Pat Paulson

Shorts
Site Supporter - Gold
Site Supporter - Gold
Posts: 3452
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 7:42 pm

#117 Unread post by Shorts »

Barrel Shroud - McCarthy
http://jp.youtube.com/watch?v=9rGpykAX1fo


Now let's learn what a barrel shroud is:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrel_shroud

AWB
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_As ... eapons_Ban



Heat Seeking Bullets
http://jp.youtube.com/watch?v=BRQqieimw ... re=related

"incendiary device" is not heat seeking :roll:

User avatar
ofblong
Legendary 2500
Legendary 2500
Posts: 2638
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 6:51 pm
Real Name: Ben
Sex: Male
Years Riding: 4
My Motorcycle: 1996 Honda Shadow Deluxe VLX
Location: Michigan

#118 Unread post by ofblong »

wow shorts went off the deep end on that one :D. anyone who still thinks he wont take guns away after those 3 posts is a fool :laughing:
96' Honda Shadow Deluxe VLX
Dream bike: Ducati Multistrada 1100S
[img]http://hdbits.org/pic/smilies/hdlove.gif[/img]

Shorts
Site Supporter - Gold
Site Supporter - Gold
Posts: 3452
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 7:42 pm

#119 Unread post by Shorts »

ofblong wrote:wow shorts went off the deep end on that one :D. anyone who still thinks he wont take guns away after those 3 posts is a fool :laughing:

:oops: yeah - well antis think it won't happen because they 'think' it won't. They have no clue as to the actual history or information about prior activities and associations.



So people can stop telling me "it won't happen" because making it happen has already been tried.

Shorts
Site Supporter - Gold
Site Supporter - Gold
Posts: 3452
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 7:42 pm

#120 Unread post by Shorts »

William Shatner on Gun Control

http://s443.photobucket.com/albums/qq15 ... ONTROL.flv




And can SOMEONE tell me why these movie characters are ALWAYS cocking a 1911!?!?!

Post Reply